Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598.

356 citing documents.

Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 606 (Minn. 2014) (stating that, when reviewing the rule- 12.02(e) dismissal of a complaint, “[appellate courts] accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party”).
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Keith Melillo v. Terry Arden Heitland 880 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2016
Keith Melillo v. Terry Arden Heitland 880 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2016
“When interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 878 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 2016
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 878 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 2016
See, e.g., Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Kristina Jean Powers v. Superintendent James Freihammer, in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kristina Jean Powers v. Superintendent James Freihammer, in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review de novo whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A, (citation omitted).
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A, (citations omitted).
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
In re the Matter of the Petition of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, For a New Certificate of Title After … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of the Petition of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, For a New Certificate of Title After … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under the Minnesota standard, a pleading is sufficient “if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
CitiMortgage, Inc., a New York corporation, in relation to Certificate of Title No. 27046 issued for land in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Grace Louise Hollingsworth v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Grace Louise Hollingsworth v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
CitiMortgage, Inc., a New York corporation, in relation to Certificate of Title No. 27046 issued for land in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
They correctly note that our supreme court has declined to adopt “the plausibility standard from Twombly and Iqbal.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912 868 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2015
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912 868 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2015
This standard requires a complaint to contain “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570).
Cody Devereaux Sleiter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 868 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2015
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Followed James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., -05 (Minn. 4 2014).
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato 863 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 2015
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4 pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Bahr, d at 80 (quotation omitted); see Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.”).
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox, and Grand Rapids State Bank, defendant/counterclaimant and third party v. Patrick Figgins, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox, and Grand Rapids State Bank, defendant/counterclaimant and third party v. Patrick Figgins, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under that rule, a claim can survive a motion to dismiss “if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., d 598, 603 (Minn. 2014); (stating that a pleading will be dismissed “only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded”) (quotation omitted).
Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief is reviewed de novo, and the reviewing court must “accept the facts 4 alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
20/20 Group, Inc. d/b/a Opportunities in Business v. Hydeaway II, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court must deny a motion to dismiss pursuant to rule 12.02(e) “if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
A district court may only dismiss a complaint under Rule 12.02(e) if “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (quoting N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395, ).
Ronald Hagle v. The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of the Benefit of CWMBS Inc., Ryan … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald Hagle v. The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of the Benefit of CWMBS Inc., Ryan … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
In the Matter of the Petition of Melvin J. Cummins for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Petition of Melvin J. Cummins for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 12.02(e); Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Carroll A. Britton v. Harry Hohman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014