Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598.

356 citing documents.

In re Welfare of the Child of R.K. 901 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 2017
When interpreting rules of procedure, we look “first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Honorable Galen J. Vaa, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 900 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2017
The court of appeals concluded that Count XI adequately alleged a violation of Minn. Stat. § 80A.68 under the standard for a motion to dismiss, see Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (requiring a court to accept the facts alleged as true and construe all reasonable inferences in the non-moving party’s favor), and therefore the district court erred in dismissing that claim.
Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
We will follow the plain and unambiguous language of a procedural rule., Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Minn. 2017
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
State v. Willis 898 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2017
State v. Willis 898 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2017
[is] ‘subject to more than one reasonable interpretation,’ will we look beyond the plain language of the rule.” Madison Equities, -72 (Minn. 2017) (quoting Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., ).
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
Bryant Avenue Baptist Church v. City of Minneapolis 892 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bryant Avenue Baptist Church v. City of Minneapolis 892 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
State v. Thomas 891 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
State v. Thomas 891 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
We do not “add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes or rules.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court may dismiss under rule 12.02 if “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (quotation omitted).
Madison Equities, Inc. v. Robert L. Crockarell 889 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 2017
Madison Equities, Inc. v. Robert L. Crockarell 889 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 2017
“When interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[Appellate courts] review de novo whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Dustin Ray George Dittmar v. George Andrew Karels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dustin Ray George Dittmar v. George Andrew Karels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A, (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
“Ambiguity exists only if the language of a rule is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Wayne Nicolaison v. Kevin Moser, Director of Minnesota Sex Offender Program Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wayne Nicolaison v. Kevin Moser, Director of Minnesota Sex Offender Program Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate courts] review de novo whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A] pleading will be dismissed only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, 12 which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (quotation omitted); see also Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (declining to adopt the federal plausibility pleading standard).
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 884 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
When interpreting court rules, we look “first to the plain language.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
P. 4.03(a); Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (discussing the requirements of personal service).
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 884 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2016
“A claim is sufficient *625 against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Alysa Zimmerle v. X-Pole USA, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Alysa Zimmerle v. X-Pole USA, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Linda �RandeeŽ Wines v. Jeff Wines Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Linda �RandeeŽ Wines v. Jeff Wines Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
that “Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” –05 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
ief can be granted.” A pleading should be dismissed under rule 12.02(e) “only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent 3 with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (quotation omitted); see also Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
When interpreting one of our rules, “we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Marisa Hunt v. State of Minnesota, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees - Minnesota Council 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marisa Hunt v. State of Minnesota, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees - Minnesota Council 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016