Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human Se…, 859 N.W.2d 288.

84 citing documents.

City of Grant, by and through its City Clerk, Kim Points, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A statute is unambiguous if it “is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation.”
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A statute is unambiguous if it “is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation.”
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Subject-matter jurisdiction “is a question of law that we review de novo.”
In the Matter of: City of Minneapolis v. Blayne Lehner, Relator. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
to support its conclusion that it had subject-matter jurisdiction over Ward’s cross-claim.
In the Matter of: City of Minneapolis v. Blayne Lehner, Relator. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy that is not granted where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.” (quotation omitted); (stating that “certiorari is an extraordinary writ that is appropriate only when no other review is authorized by law” (citing White Bear Rod & )
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A statute is unambiguous if it “is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation.”
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A statute is unambiguous if it “is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation.”
In the Matter of HIBBING TACONITE MINE AND STOCKPILE PROGRESSION and Williams Creek Project Specific Wetland Mitigation 888 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of HIBBING TACONITE MINE AND STOCKPILE PROGRESSION and Williams Creek Project Specific Wetland Mitigation 888 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-92 (Minn. 2015) (“[D]efects in subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time and cannot be waived by the parties.”).1 We therefore conclude that the county has not forfeited its arguments and we proceed to the merits of the appeal.
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
United Islamic Society v. Masjed Abubakr Al-Seddiq, Inc., and In the Matter of the: Putative Charitable Trust for … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
As appellants assert, a challenge to the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction “can be raised at any time and cannot be waived by the parties.” d 288, 291 (Minn. 2015).
Guardian Interlock Systems, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Guardian Interlock Systems, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
See, (“Therefore, if [a statute] provides a specific process for review, certio-rari review by the court of appeals is not available.” (emphasis added)).
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF A.H., Parent 879 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF A.H., Parent 879 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
City of Shorewood v. Ronald R. Johnson, Dee L. Johnson, First Bank National Association, Southdale Office Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Shorewood v. Ronald R. Johnson, Dee L. Johnson, First Bank National Association, Southdale Office Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Yer Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti and SFM Risk Solutions, North Memorial Health Care and Mercy Hospital, Relators, … Minn. 2015
Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti 865 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2015
Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti 865 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2015
Adopting the Relators’ interpretation would violate our “obligation” to read the statute as a whole and to ensure “that all of the statute’s terms are effective.” see also Kollodge v. F. & L. Appliances, Inc., 248 Minn. 357, 360 , (“It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that a particular provision of a statute cannot be read out of context but must be taken together with other related provisions to determine its meaning.”)
Yer Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti and SFM Risk Solutions, North Memorial Health Care and Mercy Hospital, Relators, … Minn. 2015
Adopting the Relators’ interpretation would violate our “obligation” to read the statute as a whole and to ensure “that all of the statute’s terms are effective.” Nelson v. 6 Schlener, see also Kollodge v. F. & L. Appliances, Inc., 248 Minn. 357, 360, (“It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that a particular provision of a statute cannot be read out of context but must be taken together with other related provisions to determine its meaning.”).
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Jurisdiction in juvenile court matters is a question of law, reviewed de novo.”), review dismissed (Minn. Apr.