Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Disciplinary Action Against Waters, 847 N.W.2d 248.

207 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Under the plain-error test, an appellant must show that there was (1) an error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error must affect substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
We have held that this difference in wording is “not trivial” because the “ ‘United States Supreme Court has upheld punishments that, although they may be cruel, are not unusual.’ ” ().
State of Minnesota v. Brian Jeffrey Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Trial counsel’s performance is presumed to be reasonable,” and “a party claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must prove both deficient performance and prejudice,”
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 248, 267 (Minn. 2014).
Matthew Thomas Fahey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The “objective standard of reasonableness” is defined as “representation by an attorney exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Sam Horace Meeks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts “afford the district court great discretion in the imposition of sentences.”
Kim Thul Ouk v. State 847 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2014
See State v. *702 Vang, , 2014 WL 1805320, *9 (Minn. May 7, 2014).