Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen Sam, 859 N.W.2d 825.

114 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“While the law does not prefer direct evidence to circumstantial evidence, a conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires that the circumstances proved be consistent with an appellant’s guilt and inconsistent with any other rational or reasonable hypothesis.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ashimiyu Gbolahan Alowonle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“While the law does not prefer direct evidence to circumstantial evidence, a conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires that the circumstances proved be consistent with an appellant’s guilt and inconsistent with any other rational or reasonable hypothesis.” d 825, 833 (Minn. App. 2015) (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Littlewolf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Littlewolf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(applying circumstantial-evidence standard of review because state introduced insufficient direct evidence of possession of requisite amount of controlled substance); see also Salyers, d at 161 (applying traditional standard of review because state introduced sufficient direct evidence of possession of firearm); (applying circumstantial-evidence standard of review because state did not introduce direct evidence of possession of firearm or controlled substance).
Ricky Alan Geving v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ricky Alan Geving v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-10 (Minn. App. 2013) (- 06 (Minn. 2013) (Stras, J., concurring)); (applying circumstantial-evidence standard of review because state did not introduce direct evidence of possession of firearm).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Michael Fenney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Michael Fenney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The circumstantial-evidence standard of review is used “when the state’s case is based largely, or entirely, on circumstantial evidence.”
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the supreme court has repeatedly applied the heightened standard when the state’s case is based largely on circumstantial evidence.