Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota, 853 N.W.2d 149.

53 citing documents.

John Stephen Woodward v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To prevail under Strickland, [a petitioner] must show that (1) his postconviction counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Burnett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Burnett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When reviewing a district court’s denial of postconviction relief, “we address questions of law de novo, review the postconviction court’s factual findings for clear error, and evaluate the postconviction court’s ultimate decision to deny relief for an abuse of discretion.”