Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota, 869 N.W.2d 316.

23 citing documents.

Chad Alan Hoflock, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
Williams v. State (Williams III), 317–18 (Minn. 2015).
Kenny Lee Reed, FKA: Gordon David Reese, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(explaining that the Knaffla rule bars consideration of claims previously raised or claims that the postconviction defendant could have raised).
Crow v. State 923 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2019
Crow v. State 923 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2019
See Williams v. State , , 319 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[W]e review the postconviction court’s underlying factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[Appellate courts] review the postconviction court’s underlying factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.”
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
Kent Richard Jones v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2016
Kent Richard Jones v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2016
In determining whether the postconviction court abused its discretion, “we review the postconviction court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.”
Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
d 316, 318 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108 876 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2016
Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2016
Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2016
“In doing so, we review the postconviction court’s underlying factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” ().

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by