Cited by

“Ineffective assistance of c ounsel renders a guilty plea involuntary and unintelligent.” aff’d

Accordingly, “[t]he complaint may provide a factual basis for a defendant’s plea, and we are permitted to examine the complaint to assess whether a defendant’s plea was accurate.” aff’d

[A]t a minimum, an attorney must review the relevant immigration statutes to determine whether a conviction will subject the defendant to a ri sk of removal from the United States.”

First, at a minimum, an attorney must review the relevant immigration statutes to determine whether a conviction will subject the defe ndant to a risk of removal from the United States.”

“But the use of leading questions does not, by itself, require reversal.” , aff’d, .

See Trott, d at 252 (stating that “defendant, by his plea of guilty, in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint”); (“The complaint may provide a factual basis for a defendant’s plea, and we are permitted to examine the complaint to assess whether a defendant’s plea was accurate.”), aff’d

See, (“The complaint may provide a factual basis for a defendant’s plea, and we are perm itted to examine the complaint to assess whether a de fendant’s plea was accurate.” (c iting Trott, d at 252)), aff’d, (“This court may also look to the whole record, beyond what the defendant said, when evaluating the quality of a guilty plea’s factual basis.” ( citing Trott, d at 251 -52)).

Sanchez v. State , -20 (Minn. 2 Nyagoko filed a cross-appeal related to a warra nt of apprehension filed after the district court granted Nyagoko’s postconviction petition.

the attorney has a constitutiona l obligation to advise the de fendant of this fact,” but otherwise “a general advisory warning about the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea is sufficient.”