Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Matter of: Cindy Jean Oberg obo minor child v. Gregory Brian Bradley, 868 N.W.2d 62.

75 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Tonia Lynn McRunnel and on behalf of minor children v. Adam Joseph McRunnel Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Staples-Motley School District (A19-0466), Paul David Anderson (A19-0468) v. Dave Johnson, a/k/a David Kenneth Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Although the language in the Domestic Abuse Act has since changed from “full hearing” to “hearing,” the relevant language in section 609.748 has remained the same.
In re the Matter of: Susan Ann Ericson o/b/o Minor v. Darryl Wayne Millner, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
in this manner [was] not ‘reasonable discipline.’” -66 (Minn. App. 2015) (in determining whether repeatedly spanking a child can be considered unreasonable discipline, this court acknowledged that the evidence in Johnson did not support the finding that the child was endangered, but concluded that the evidence in Oberg supported issuing the OFP).
In the Matter of Larissa Michele Hansen on behalf of Minor Child v. Timothy Charles Richter Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subds.
In the Matter of: Joanne Lynn Kargel Lund v. Michael Alan Lund Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See 1995 Minn. Laws ch. 142, § 5, at 404; 2002 Minn. Laws ch. 304, § 10, at 442
Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James 903 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James 903 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel v. Michael James Rossman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See 1995 Minn. Laws ch. 142 § 5, at 404; 2002 Minn. Laws ch. 304 § 7, at 442
In the Matter of: Marissa Jean Newton-Denila, on behalf of minor children v. Ejiro Elqanah Newton-Denila Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4(b) (“A petition for relief shall allege the existence of domestic abuse, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating the specific facts and circumstances from which relief is sought.”); (“[A] petitioner must meet the .
In the Matter of: Krystal Marie Ketchmark v. Aaron Bruce Fruen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Amanda Jean Vail v. Ryan Joseph Vail Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4(b) (“A petition for relief shall allege the existence of domestic abuse, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating the specific facts and circumstances from which relief is sought.”); Oberg v. Bradley , (holding that “a pe titioner must meet the .
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children v. Michael John Mohr Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Ober g v. Bradley , (requiring petitioners to meet preponderance-of-the-evidence standard to obtain an OFP).
In the Matter of: Josephine Pearl Paul v. David Kevin Wittman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Olson ex rel. A.C.O. v. Olson 892 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Olson ex rel. A.C.O. v. Olson 892 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4(b) (2014); (holding preponderance standard applies even though statute is silent on the matter).
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Chelsea Chantel Hall and o/b/o J. B. A v. Jamison Robert Arend Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Chelsea Chantel Hall and o/b/o J. B. A v. Jamison Robert Arend Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(Minn. 1 Domestic abuse may also include “the infliction of fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault.” Id., subd.
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1101; (applying Minnesota Rules of Evidence in OFP appeal).