Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke, 884 N.W.2d 634.

63 citing documents.

Cornell v. Ripka 897 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The decision whether relief is warranted under Rule 60.02 is committed to the sound discretion of the district court and is based upon all the surrounding circumstances of each case”; an appellate court will reverse “only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion.”
Larson Ventures, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gams, Cole, see Minn. R. Civ.
Cyrus E. Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Vadnais Heights, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cole v. Wutzke , (stating that some of the Finden-factor showings may be stronger than others, but “the moving party must establish all four requirements for relief to be warranted.”).
Susan Dianna Orr v. Rebecca Kay Britten Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Margaret MacCallum and Antimo Veneziale, individually, and as assignees of James S. Poyser and Ashley E. Poyser (Bystrom) … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Susan Dianna Orr v. Rebecca Kay Britten Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We reverse and remand for the district court’s reconsideration in light of the supreme court’s
Margaret MacCallum and Antimo Veneziale, individually, and as assignees of James S. Poyser and Ashley E. Poyser (Bystrom) … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] debatably meritorious claim is one that, if established at trial, presents a cognizable claim for relief.”
John Troupe v. Jeff Foster Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Troupe v. Jeff Foster Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Due diligence “is assessed from the time that the movant learns of his or her error or omission.” d 634, 639 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. T. K. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016