Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In the Matter of Hibbing Taconite Mine and Stockpile Progression and Williams Creek Proje…, 888 N.W.2d 336.

18 citing documents.

Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased v. Park Nicollet Clinic Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See In re Hibbing Taconite Mine & Stockpile Progression , (stating that the doctrine of invited error “precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which [they] invited or could have prevented in the court below” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Deanna Sue Konz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Deanna Sue Konz Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Maria Olson, et al v. Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Minn. Ct. App. 2024
precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the court below.” (quotation omitted).
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The invited-error doctrine “precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the [district] court.”
City of Eden Prairie v. Travis R. Serafin, Public Employees Retirement Association 7 N.W.3d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
City of Eden Prairie v. Travis R. Serafin, Public Employees Retirement Association 7 N.W.3d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Wetland Conservation Act appeal filed by David Stock of a Restoration Order located … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Wetland Conservation Act appeal filed by David Stock of a Restoration Order located … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ANALYSIS The WCA “was adopted by the legislature in 1991 for the purpose of preserving and restoring Minnesota wetlands.”
Minnesota Internship Center v. Minnesota Department of Education Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minnesota Internship Center v. Minnesota Department of Education Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[D]efects in subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at any time and cannot be waived by the parties.” (citing Nelson, d at 291-92).
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, et al., Charles Christie, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the court below.” (quotation omitted).
Ridgewood Bay Resort, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2022
precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the court below.” (quotation omitted) ; see Am.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Ricardo O’Neal Minn. Ct. App. 2022
That rule relates to “supplemental legal authority.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2016).
Christina Ginther v. Enzuri Group, LLC, et al. on Related Appeal, Independent Women’s Football League on Related Appeal Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[T]he doctrine of invited error [] precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the court below.” (quotation omitted); see, (“Plaintiff cannot base his appeal on an instruction which his own counsel submitted to the trial court by stipulation.”).
In re the Marriage of: Greta Mae Markuson, n/k/a Greta Mae Garcia v. Brenden Peter Markuson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(refusing to preclude argument under the invited-error doctrine because the error implicated the court’s subject- matter jurisdiction); (opining that arguments concerning plain error might not be forfeited under the in
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff v. Kurt D. Duhn Minn. Ct. App. 2019