Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators,…, 889 N.W.2d 796.

24 citing documents.

Daniel Johnson (A23-0543), Relator v. Concrete Treatments, Inc., and Technology Insurance Company, and ... 7 N.W.3d 119 Minn. 2024
Daniel Johnson (A23-0543), Relator v. Concrete Treatments, Inc., and Technology Insurance Company, and ... 7 N.W.3d 119 Minn. 2024
Gianotti v. ISD 152, (concluding that a single statement taken out of context did not discredit an expert’s entire report).
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Daniel Bierbach, Chutich, J. Minn. 2021
Margaret Leuthard, Minn. 2021
Independent School District No. 477, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
152 , -02 (Minn. 2017)).
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard Edward Bosse, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0245501. Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Minn. 2020
152, (sta ting that appellate courts defer to the factfinder’s weighing of competing and c onflicting expert testimony).
Tony Flattum, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mark Kedrowski, Minn. 2019
Smith v. Carver Cnty. 931 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 2019
Smith v. Carver Cnty. 931 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 2019
152 , , 803 (Minn. 2017) ("In weighing medical evidence, a compensation judge has the discretion as the trier of fact to choose between competing and conflicting medical experts' reports and opinions.").
Bruton v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 2019
Bruton v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 2019
152 , , 800 (Minn. 2017) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 176.421 , subd.
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
152 , , 803 (Minn. 2017) ("In weighing medical *31 evidence, a compensation judge has the discretion as the trier of fact to choose between competing and conflicting medical experts' reports and opinions."); see also Ruether v. State , , 478 (Minn. 1990) ("We have frequently had occasion to point out that it
A17-1096 Minn. 2018
152, (“In weighing medical evidence, a compensation judge has the discretion as the trier of fact to choose between competing and conflicting medical experts’ reports and opinions.”); (“We have frequently had occasion to point out that it is
Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores 898 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores 898 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
152, (holding that an expert opinion rests on adequate foundation if the expert was provided "enough facts to form a reasonable opinion that is not based on speculation or conjecture”).
Hudson v. Trillium Staffing 896 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2017
Hudson v. Trillium Staffing 896 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2017