Cited by

(stating that for sentencing purposes Minnesota Statutes section 609.342, subdivision 1(a) (2010) , criminalizes one act of sexual penetration and does not constitute a ); see also Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd.

7 Counts 2 and 4 are not continuing offenses and therefore appellant “did not commit a criminal act every day over the period of time he sexually abused the victim.” (concluding that the same statute for which appellant here was convicted did not constitute a ).

–07 (Minn. 2018); (holding that possession of a firearm by an ineligible person is a continuing offense); (holding that “concealing or possessing stolen goods” is a continuing offense); State v. Burnet

(citing Burnett for the proposition that the Minnesota Supreme Court has concluded that other crimes, including escape, are continuing offenses for the purpose of the statute of limitations).

A prior felony conviction has decayed if “a period of fifteen years has elapsed since the date of discharge from or expiration of the sentence, to the date of the current offense.” Id.; aff’d

When calculating a criminal -history score, “the entire range of dates over which a continuing crime is committed constitutes the date of the current offense.” (quotation omitted).

“Generally, we afford district courts great discretion in the imposition of sentences, a nd we will reverse a se ntencing decision only when a district court abuses its discretion.” State v. Washington , (quotation omitted), aff’d

we often consult dictionary definitions to ascertain the plain and ordinary meaning of words or phrases.” (quotation omitted).

Scovel , d at 554 ; State v. Washington , , 606 (Minn. 2018).

State v. Washington , , 606 (Minn. 2018).