Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc., 637 N.W.2d 270.

35 citing documents.

Deanna M. Kortan v. St. Louis Park Hockey Boosters, also known as St. Louis Park Hockey Association Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(a), are not limited to reports that implicate public policy.”
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
Anoka County, Anoka, Minnesota v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minn. 2024
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Ctr., Inc.
Mark Osland v. City of Minneapolis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Women’s Ctr., Inc., (citing federal cases interpreting the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, Pub.
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Women’s Ctr., Inc., *151 (noting that Phipps “did not resolve whether Minnesota should join the majority of states that had recognized a cause of action for wrongful discharge”).
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Women’s Ctr., Inc., (holding that the whistleblower act contains no public policy requirement, requiring only a good faith belief that the employer is violating a state or federal law or rule).
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
18, 1999), overruled on other grounds, Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., -77 (Minn.2002).
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
Women’s Ctr., Inc., (citing federal cases interpreting WPA).
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka 783 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2010
The court of appeals is not “a court of last resort.” See Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., (stating that the court of appeals is not the court of last resort with respect to statutory construction).
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
Women’s Ctr., Inc., (“The court of appeals is not the court of last resort with respect to a statute’s construction.”).
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 781 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 2010
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 781 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 2010
§ 645.16; see also Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc.
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's *19 Ctr., Inc., see also 17 Stephen F. Befort, Minnesota Practice-Employment Law & Practice § 11.1 (2d ed. 2003) (discussing the employment-at-will doctrine).
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., (“rejecting] the importation of a public policy requirement into the whistleblower statute and holding] that the protections of section 181.932, subd.
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sloan 729 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Contra Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc., (rejecting public policy requirement of Minn.Stat.
Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2006
Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2006
Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc.
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Andersom-Johanningmeier v. -Mid-Minnesota Women’s Ctr., Inc.
Knuth Ex Rel. Knuth v. Emergency Care Consultants, P.A. 644 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Knuth Ex Rel. Knuth v. Emergency Care Consultants, P.A. 644 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Women’s Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
In our recent decision in Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Center, Inc., we held that the protections of Minn.Stat.