Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester, 690 N.W.2d 721.

50 citing documents.

Anjela Carpenter v. Meridian Behavioral Health LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“[P]laintiffs must adhere to strict compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 145.682.”).
In the Marriage of: Jarrid Daniel DeGolier v. Jessica Jean DeGolier Baron, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Jarrid Daniel DeGolier v. Jessica Jean DeGolier Baron, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Santa Williamson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
we decline to review [the] issue[].” see also Ward v. El Rancho Manana, Inc., (“[P]arties forfeit any issues that they do not 12 argue in their brief.”), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 73, 77 (Minn. 2024) (continuance of criminal trial); (continuance of deadline to provide an affidavit of expert review); (continuance under Minn. R. Civ.
Joyce Wolling, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The expert-review and expert-disclosure affidavit requirements are designed to be “a means of readily identifying meritless lawsuits at an early stage of the litigation,” and to eliminate “frivolous” lawsuits, Sorenson v. St.
Kimberly Kay Mountjoy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“[P]laintiffs must adhere to strict compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 145.682.”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Tokvan Ly. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(declining to review issue that “was neither timely presented before the district court nor adequately briefed on appeal”).
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton v. TMS Treatment Center, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton v. TMS Treatment Center, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Similarly, does not help us determine whether service of an expert- review affidavit is required to commence an action.
Joseph Kurian, individually, and as Trustee for Samael Alessandro Ittyerah, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
These statutory requirements were enacted “as a means of readily identifying meritless lawsuits at an early stage of the litigation.”
Everest Stables, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Tonia N. Williams, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We ge nerally decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed, Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester , as inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an appellate court
Phillip Musselman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co., -46 (Minn. 1997) (admissibility of evidence); Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester , (statutory compliance of expert affidavit) (“We will reverse a district court’s dismissal of a malpractice claim for noncompliance with expert disclosure only if the district court abused its discretion.”).
Ludwig P. Samson, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Christine R. Samson, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
will not excuse or justify an affidavit of expert identification falling short of the substantive disclosure requirement.” Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc., (“So as not to undermine the legislative aim of expe rt review and disclosure, we have stressed that plaintiffs must adhere to strict compliance with th e requirements of Minn. Stat. § 145.682.”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester , (stating that, generally, appellate courts “decline to review” questions “neither timely presented before the district court nor adequately briefed on appeal”).
Freddie James Prewitt-Bey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The Mi nnesota legislature enacted expert-review and expert- disclosure requirements as a means of readily identifying meritless lawsuits at an early stage of the litigation.” Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester
Steve Carlson v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, Minnesota State Legislature 888 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
Steve Carlson v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, Minnesota State Legislature 888 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
(noting that we generally decline to consider issues that are not adequately briefed).
Edward David Stahlmann v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, Centurion of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Edward David Stahlmann v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, Centurion of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813 872 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813 872 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2015
(reviewing a referee’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion); (reviewing a district court’s decision regarding whether to extend a scheduling-order deadline for an abuse of discretion); (reviewing a district court’s rulings regarding discovery for an abuse of discretion).
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P. A., Nina Mattson 863 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P. A., Nina Mattson 863 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary Cyril Jenco v. Paul James Crowe, M.D., John Y. Hendricks, M.D., North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The requirements for both the Affidavit of Expert Review and the Affidavit of Expert Identification were enacted “as a means of readily identifying meritless lawsuits at an early stage of litigation.”
Kimberly Shierts, Trustee for the Heirs of Jodie Shierts v. University of Minnesota Physicians, Regents of the University … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kimberly Shierts, Trustee for the Heirs of Jodie Shierts v. University of Minnesota Physicians, Regents of the University … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“So as not to undermine the legislative aim of expert review and 7 disclosure, we have stressed that plaintiffs must adhere to strict compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 145.682.”
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Wesely v. Flor 806 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2011
Wesely v. Flor 806 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2011
Wesely v. Flor 791 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Wesely v. Flor 791 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
6(c) (2006), which also refers to “deficiencies,” that it is “true that an affidavit may be sufficient to satisfy the 180-day requirement even though it contains minor deficiencies” but that it is also “true that an affidavit is not sufficient to satisfy the 180-day requirement if the deficiencies are so great that it provides no significant information”); (“The expert disclosure requirements cannot be met by a witness who is not qualified to give an expert opinion.”); Sorenson v. St.
State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2006
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2006
*641 728 (Minn.2005) (-83 (Minn.1988)).
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(reviewing dismissal of complaint for noncompliance with expert disclosure).
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that plaintiffs failure to strictly comply with expert-disclosure procedure requires dismissal with prejudice).