Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Wicks, 364 N.W.2d 844.

24 citing documents.

A20-0560 A20-0562 A20-0565 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 844 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Jeremy Epperson. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Distinguished In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Generally, the right to treatment issue is not reviewed on appeal from a commitment order.” review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985).
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
7; (holding that district court erred in prescribing a treatment program), review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985).
In re the Civil Commitment of Lonergan 792 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Lonergan 792 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that “[gjenerally, the right to treatment issue is not reviewed on appeal from a commitment order”), review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985).
In Re the Civil Commitment of Travis 767 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Civil Commitment of Travis 767 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-68 (Minn.1982) (noting that because appellant could not predict that he would be deprived of treatment while in prison, his argument was premature); (noting that “right-to-treatment issue is not reviewed on appeal from a commitment order”), review denied (Minn. May 31, 1985); -84 (Minn.App.1984) (noting that Pope’s claim about receiving “inadequate treatment is speculative and premature” because no deprivation of
Matter of McPherson 476 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of McPherson 476 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Bowers 456 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-48 (Minn.App.1985), pet.
Matter of Kolodrubetz 411 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Kolodrubetz 411 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jarvis v. Levine 403 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jarvis v. Levine 403 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Danielson 398 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Danielson 398 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Cieminski 374 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Cieminski 374 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Harhut 367 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Harhut 367 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1985