Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moes v. City of St. Paul, 402 N.W.2d 520.

26 citing documents.

Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Paul, a workers’ compensation judge “misplaced employee’s brief and by ex parte communication, requested an additional copy of his brief.”
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Minn. 2020
Glub a v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry , (assessing whether the Legislature “could reasonably have believed in any facts” to support th e connection between the classification and purpose of the law); (“[I]t is not this court’s function, at least in the absence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, to second-guess the scientific accuracy of a legislative determination of fact.” (quoting Minn. St.
Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co. 869 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2015
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
Paul, (job transfer); see also Minn. Stat. § 176.66 , subd.
Meinzer v. Buhl 66 C & B Warehouse Distributing, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Meinzer v. Buhl 66 C & B Warehouse Distributing, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-86 (Minn.1987) (affirming vacation of public utilities commission order, where public utilities commissioner had been discussing employment with utility during time that public utilities commission had considered and approved utility’s proposed rate increase); , 524 n. 2 (Minn.1987) (although ex parte request by workers’ compensation judge for extra copy of brief from attorney was not grounds for reversal, supreme court cautioned against ex parte communication and instructed that, even when req
Swanson v. City of St. Paul 526 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1995
Swanson v. City of St. Paul 526 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1995
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
Clabo v. Bor-Son Construction Co. 481 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1992
Clabo v. Bor-Son Construction Co. 481 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1992
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
Paul, the rational basis test under the Minnesota Constitution requires more factual support than is present here to establish a genuine and substantial distinction between the two substances.
Stillson v. Peterson & Hede Co. 454 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1990
Stillson v. Peterson & Hede Co. 454 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1990
Deschampe v. Arrowhead Tree Service 428 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
Deschampe v. Arrowhead Tree Service 428 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
Flint v. American Can Co. 426 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1988
Flint v. American Can Co. 426 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schroeder v. Highway Services 403 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1987
Schroeder v. Highway Services 403 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1987
Paul, we held that recovery of permanent partial disability compensation is not dependent upon loss of wages but upon functional loss or impairment.