Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Haggerty, 448 N.W.2d 363.

240 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of C.D.N. 559 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of J.K.B. 552 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of J.K.B. 552 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
We presume that state statutes are constitutional, “and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
In Re Alternative Minimum Tax Refund Cases 546 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1996
In Re Alternative Minimum Tax Refund Cases 546 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1996
(statutes are presumed constitutional, and constitutional violations must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt).
Rb v. Cs 536 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
R.B. v. C.S. 536 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
R.B. v. C.S. 536 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Because this would be an unconstitutional deprivation of due process, and we must presume that the statute is constitutional, we hold that a child who is not represented in an adjudication of her paternity may bring a subsequent paternity action pursuant to the Minnesota Parentage Act and the results of the earlier adjudication are not determinative as to her.
Rb v. Cs 536 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Because this would be an unconstitutional deprivation of due process, and we must presume that the statute is constitutional, we hold that a child who is not represented in an adjudication of her paternity may bring a subsequent paternity action pursuant to the Minnesota Parentage Act and the results of the earlier adjudication are not determinative as to her.
Cressy v. Grassmann 536 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cressy v. Grassmann 536 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Manning 532 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Manning 532 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and will be declared unconstitutional “only when absolutely necessary.” (citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 529 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1995
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 529 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1995
Statutes are presumptively constitutional, and should be declared unconstitutional "only when absolutely necessary."
Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners 525 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners 525 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Burns 524 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Burns 524 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Alton v. Wabedo Township 524 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Alton v. Wabedo Township 524 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 510 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme 510 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
In Re Blodgett 510 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1994
State v. Christie 506 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1993
State v. Christie 506 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1993
In Re Blodgett 490 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Blodgett 490 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Medill v. State 477 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1991
Medill v. State 477 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1991
Ruzic v. Commissioner of Public Safety 455 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ruzic v. Commissioner of Public Safety 455 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1990