Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Haggerty, 448 N.W.2d 363.

240 citing documents.

City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
Bortnem v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bortnem v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
We are mindful that “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Johnson v. 1996 GMC Sierra, VIN: 1GTEK19R4TE551384 606 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. 1996 GMC Sierra, VIN: 1GTEK19R4TE551384 606 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Masters v. Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 604 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Masters v. Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 604 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(stating party challenging statute has burden of demonstrating violation of Minnesota Constitution beyond reasonable doubt).
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 600 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 600 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
(citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
State v. Tenerelli 598 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1999
State v. Tenerelli 598 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1999
We presume that Minnesota statutes are constitutional, and “our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
(citing City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, ).
Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Moreover, the, “power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community v. Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board 586 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community v. Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board 586 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Petition of Santoro 578 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Petition of Santoro 578 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Courts exercise their power to declare statutes unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
Westling v. County of Mille Lacs 581 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1998
Westling v. County of Mille Lacs 581 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1998
Statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and the judicial power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. MacHholz 574 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1998
State v. MacHholz 574 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 1998
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Oslund v. Johnson 567 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Oslund v. Johnson 567 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
We note, however, that Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and are declared unconstitutional only with extreme caution and when absolutely necessary, and that this statute has already been challenged unsuccessfully on equal protection grounds.
State v. Behl 564 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
State v. Behl 564 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of C.D.N. 559 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Cuypers 559 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Cuypers 559 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1997