Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Abbott v. Abbott, 481 N.W.2d 864.

22 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Maria Cristina Gallo-Valdivia, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
17 decision to either modify or not modify custody.”
In the Matter of: Joseph Daryll Rued on behalf of minor child, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that appointment of a GAL was not mandatory because the respondent presented sufficient evidence to rebut appellant’s unsubstantiated allegation of physical abuse); (holding that appointment of a GAL was not mandatory because the children did not meet the definition of “victim of domestic abuse or neglect”); (holding that appointment of a GAL was not mandatory because the appellant presented insufficien
Nicholas David Wivinus, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that specific findings on the best-interests factors are “ab solutely required”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Emotional abuse alone may amount to endangerment, and “when an allegation of such abuse is supported by some evidence, an evidentiary hearing is appropriate.” Tarlan, d at 923-24 (citing Abbott v. Abbott , -69 (Minn. 1992) (reversing denial of an evidentiary hearing when mother’s history of throwing children out 11 of house created stress and anxiety in anticipation of being thrown out again in the future); Harkema v. Harkema , (reversing denial of an evidentiary hearing wh
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Instead, for the principle that appellate courts “unwaveringly remand[] decisions modifying custody when there have been inadequate findings to demonstrate that the appropriate factors were considered.” Meyer’s argument overlooks that the district court declined to modify custody in the order she app
In re the Marriage of: David Allen Anderson v. Lisa Marie Anderson n/k/a Lisa Marie Syverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Allen Anderson v. Lisa Marie Anderson n/k/a Lisa Marie Syverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that specific findings are unnecessary under Minn. Stat. § 518.18 when denying a custody-modification motion without an evidentiary hearing for failure to make a prima facie case).
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Without findings by the district court addressing the best-interests factors, “it is nearly impossible for [an] appellate court to conduct a meaningful review.” (remanding a modification of custody to the district court for best-interests findings).
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rogge v. Rogge 509 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogge v. Rogge 509 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
§§ 518.17-.18 are “absolutely required.”
Marriage of Smith v. Smith 508 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Smith v. Smith 508 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Weiler v. Lutz 501 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Weiler v. Lutz 501 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1993