Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Piotter v. Steffen, 490 N.W.2d 915.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Shawn Jamison. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“In evaluating whether a petitioner has demonstrated the appropriateness of transfer by a preponderance of the evidence, ‘[t]he panel must address the statutory factors.’” (alteration in original) ( rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Raymond Coker. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Bruce Eberhardt Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Piotter v. Steffen , (quoting Johnson v. Noot , ), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Thomas Ladon Webber. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
rt reviews decisions by a judicial appeal panel for clear error, “examin[ing] the record to determine whether the evidence as a whole sustains the appeal panels’ findings” and not “weigh[ing] the evidence as if trying the matter de novo.” ( (quotation omitted); review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Dezeray Marie Roblero-Barrios. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Generally, we determine “from an examination of the record if the evidence as a whole sustains [a judicial] appeal panel’s findings.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Dale Allen Lindsey. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A judicial appeal panel clearly errs if it ignores the “vast weight of the evidence.” -920 (Minn. App. 1 Although Minn. R. Civ.
A17-0613 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
at 314; review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alexander Mark Martinelli. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
” review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Edwin Harju Minn. Ct. App. 2017
647, 650 (Minn. App. 2017) (concerning provisional discharge), review denied (Minn. June 20, 2017); (concerning transfer), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Donald Dean Christiansen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., Rydberg v. Goodno , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Barber Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse L. Lee f/k/a Dennis L. Wiesinger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse L. Lee f/k/a Dennis L. Wiesinger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A judicial appeal panel clearly errs if it ignores the “vast weight of the evidence.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
6 In evaluating whether a petitioner has demonstrated the appropriateness of transfer by a preponderance of the evidence, “[t]he panel must address the statutory factors.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, this court reviews decisions by a judicial appeal panel for clear error, “examining] the record to determine whether the evidence as a whole sustains the appeal panels’ findings” and not “weighting] the evidence as if trying the matter de novo.” (quotation omitted); review denied (Minn. Nov.
Coker v. Ludeman 775 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Coker v. Ludeman 775 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In its conclusions of law, the appeal panel stated that “[t]he statute and case law require that the party seeking a transfer must prove that the transfer is appropriate by a preponderance of the evidence,” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Rydberg v. Goodno 689 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rydberg v. Goodno 689 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Nov.