Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ostrem, 535 N.W.2d 916.
-
State v. Stevens
580 N.W.2d 75
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(“Mere presence at the scene of a crime does not alone prove that a person aided or abetted, because inaction, knowledge, or passive acquiescence does not rise to the level of criminal culpability.”).
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Coleman 560 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Coleman 560 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Wallace
558 N.W.2d 469
Minn. 1997
924 n. 10 (Minn.1995) (noting that the defendant failed to identify evidence in the record supporting an alternative theory).
- State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
- State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996