Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cole, 542 N.W.2d 43.

156 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Demetreus Anthony McGinnis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Demetreus Anthony McGinnis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Verdicts are legally inconsistent when proof of the elements of one offense negates a necessary element of another offense.”
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph Shane 883 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph Shane 883 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“The refusal to give a requested jury instruction lies within the discretion of the district court and no error results if no abuse of discretion is shown.”).
State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hamzeh Daghighian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jamah Griffis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hamzeh Daghighian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that appellant’s “intent to cause fear in [the victim] was carried out by his intentional pointing of a gun at her”); (“Pointing a weapon at a police officer or another person has been held to supply the requisite int
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jamah Griffis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Statutes section 609.66, subdivision 1a(a)(3), prohibits a person from “recklessly discharg[ing] a firearm within a municipality.” A person acts “recklessly” if he “consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the element of an offense exists or will result from his conduct.” (quotation omitted); (applying the Cole definition of “reckless” to Minnesota Statutes section 609.66, subdivision 1a(a)(3)).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Verdicts are legally inconsistent when proof of the elements of one offense negates a necessary element of another offense.” 4 (Minn. 1996).
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that a defendant’s “intent to cause fear in [the victim] was carried out by his intentional pointing of a gun at her”); (defendant pointed scissors and screwdriver at victim, assumed a position that the victim considered threatening
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Verdicts are legally inconsistent when proof of the elements of one offense negates a necessary element of another offense.”
State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale Trevino Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale Trevino Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that second-degree assault “forms a proper predicate felony to a felony murder conviction” because “assault is not a property crime, but a crime against the person”); Smoot, d at 853 (holding that felony DWI poses a special danger to human life
State of Minnesota v. Sean David Kilbo Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Sean David Kilbo Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[A] person acts ‘recklessly’ when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the element of an offense exists or will result from his conduct.”
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Ndikum 802 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Ndikum 802 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Fleck 797 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Fleck 797 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. HEIGES 779 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. HEIGES 779 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Bjergum 771 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Bjergum 771 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Arredondo v. State 754 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
Arredondo v. State 754 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
We have said that “[v]erdicts are legally inconsistent when proof of the elements of one offense negates a necessary element of another offense.”
State v. Engle 743 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2008
State v. Engle 743 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2008
State v. Smoot 737 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Smoot 737 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See Anderson, d at 699 -700 (-77 (Minn.1983), ).