Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law O'Toole, 560 N.W.2d 83.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Christian 657 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2003
    The record does not provide a sufficient basis to review appellant’s complaints, most of which require “additional facts to explain the attorney’s decisions.” , 85 n. 1 (Minn.1997).
  • Johnson v. State 654 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
  • Boitnott v. State 640 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2002
    (affirming a denial in part because of an 18 year delay in filing, a petition); (affirming a denial in part because of an 8-year delay in filing a petition).
  • Robledo-Kinney v. State 637 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2002
  • Hummel v. State 617 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
    494 & n. 3 (Minn. 1997); , 85 n. 1 (Minn.1997).
  • State v. Riendeau 603 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
  • Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
  • Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
  • Sutherlin v. State 574 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1998
  • Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
  • Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
    (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , ).
  • King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
  • Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
    He also contends that “there were [sic] more than one plausible lines [sic] of defense, and counsel knew this as a fact.” This court has held that postcon-viction claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel are “generally precluded if known at the time of direct appeal.”