Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fahrendorff Ex Rel. Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., 597 N.W.2d 905.

50 citing documents.

Messan Adjignon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Under the well -established principle of respondeat superior,” a third-party principal is vicariously liable for the torts of an agent “committed within the course and scope of employment.” Fahrendorff by Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotations omitted).
Lauren Strahan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., -10 (Minn. 1999).
Pedro Alonzo v. Richard Menholt 9 N.W.3d 148 Minn. 2024
Pedro Alonzo v. Richard Menholt 9 N.W.3d 148 Minn. 2024
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (“Under the well-established principle of respondeat superior, an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of an employee committed within the course and scope of employment.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
Nicholas W. Sterry v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC), and Correctional Officer ... 8 N.W.3d 224 Minn. 2024
Nicholas W. Sterry v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC), and Correctional Officer ... 8 N.W.3d 224 Minn. 2024
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quoting Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., ) (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added).
Craig A Reichel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Doe 598, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Nicholas W. Sterry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., Lange, d at 786.
David Loe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Homes, Inc., (quotations omitted).
Ismail Ibrahim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).
Patrick Takuanyi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
, A17-2080, A17-2081, A18-0015 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc. , (quotation omitted) (distinguishing the degree of foreseeability required in the respondeat superior context from that required in direct negligence cases).
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the context of negligence and negligent supervision claims, foreseeability means “a level of probability which would lead a prudent person to take effective precautions.” Fahrendorff by Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Jason Jalony Cox v. Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jason Jalony Cox v. Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotations omitted).
Sysdyne Corporation v. Brian Rousslang 860 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 2015
Sysdyne Corporation v. Brian Rousslang 860 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 2015
See, e.g., Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P. 767 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P. 767 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Because Yath’s only recognized and remaining tort claim against Fairview (invasion of privacy) addresses intentional conduct, the district court should have applied the two-part test used in Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotation omitted).
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
I. Under “respondeat superior, an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of an employee committed within the course and scope of employment.” Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota 723 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota 723 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Under the ‘well-established principle’ of respondeat superior, ‘an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of an employee committed within the course and scope of employment.’ Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., ().
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 657 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 657 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Under the ‘well-established principle’ of respondeat superior, ‘an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of an employee committed within the scope of employment.’ ” Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., (citation omitted).
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 401 , see also P.L.
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc.
Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc. 633 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2001
Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc. 633 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2001
E.g., Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.
Dale Properties, LLC v. State 619 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Dale Properties, LLC v. State 619 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., -10 (Minn.1999).
Hagen v. American Agency, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hagen v. American Agency, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Fakrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., (observing that appellate courts will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal).
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 610 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2000
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 610 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2000
Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.