Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vangsness v. Vangsness, 607 N.W.2d 468.

485 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A finding is clearly erroneous if the reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” d 468, 472 (Minn. App. 2000) (quotations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“That the record might support findings other than those made by the [district] court does not show that the court’s findings are defective.” see Elliott v. Mitchell, 311 Minn. 533, 535, (affirming findings, but noting that evidence might have supported another conclusion); Zander v. Zander, 3 (observing that, while the
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D'Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[t]hat the record might support findings other than those made by the trial court does not show that the court’s findings are defective.”
In re the Marriage of: Kerry S. Spolum v. Michael J. D'Amato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
21, 2007); (stating that a finding is clearly erroneous if this court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made”) (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Christophe Traore Dit Labarere v. Fatima Lakehal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christophe Traore Dit Labarere v. Fatima Lakehal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The law “leaves scant if any room for an appellate court to question the [district] court’s balancing of best-interests considerations.”
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether findings are clearly erroneous, the appellate court views the record in the light most favorable to the 9 [district] court’s findings.”
In re the Marriage of: Holly Beth Ogilvie, n/k/a Holly Beth Gislason v. John Richard Ogilvie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly Beth Ogilvie, n/k/a Holly Beth Gislason v. John Richard Ogilvie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Because the district court has broad discretion in deciding what is in the best interests of a child (here, whether removal is in the child’s best interests), there is “scant if any room for an appellate court to question the [district] court’s balancing of best-interests considerations.” d 468, 477 (Minn. App. 2000).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Andrusko v. Genevieve Ann Andrusko Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: A. B. Wayne Belisle v. Yana Verzhbitskaya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A finding is clearly erroneous when “the reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court’s finding is clearly erroneous only if, after viewing the record in a light most favorable to the district court’s finding, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Andrusko v. Genevieve Ann Andrusko Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether findings are clearly erroneous, the appellate court views the record in the light most favorable to the [district] court’s findings.” d 468, 472 (Minn. App. 2000).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“That the record might support findings other than those made by the [district] court does not show that the court’s findings are defective.”).
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The law “leaves scant if any 3 room for an appellate court to question the [district] court’s balancing of best-interests considerations.”
Wayne Earl Dahl v. Stephen Sean Cummings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wayne Earl Dahl v. Stephen Sean Cummings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paige J. Wentzel v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paige J. Wentzel v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that the mere fact that the record “might support findings other than those made by the trial court does not show that the court’s findings are defective”).
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Custody award “When determining whether findings are clearly erroneous, the appellate court views the record in the light most favorable to the [district] court’s findings.”
State of Minnesota v. Jason Wade Hostutler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Wade Hostutler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Calvin James Omtvedt v. Amanda Marie Jansen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Calvin James Omtvedt v. Amanda Marie Jansen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“That the record might support findings other than those made by the trial court does not show that the court’s findings are defective.” (discussing review of best-interests factors on appeal of initial custody award).
In re the Marriage of: Daria Vladimirovna Tinaza v. Justin Andrew Tinaza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Daria Vladimirovna Tinaza v. Justin Andrew Tinaza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The law “leaves scant if any room for an appellate court to question the [district] court’s balancing of best- interests considerations.”
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014