DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142.

53 citing documents.

Minnesota Attorney General’s Office v. Schierholz and Associates, Inc., d/b/a Broadmoor Valley, Paul Milton Schierholz Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Sys., Inc., (“a district court has the discretion to decide whether the fact finder in an equitable action will be the judge or a jury”).
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, et al., Stieg Strand, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, et al., Stieg Strand, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
David Levy v. Daily Dental Care, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag v. David Alan Slag Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Spring Grove Township v. Brian Myrah, Karen Fried, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jade Joseph Nickels v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Dynamic Energy Solutions, LLC v. Danna, LLC, d/b/a Catalyst Modern Energy, FK Construction Funding, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Trust of Donald Roy Scheid and June Vivian Scheid, Joint Revocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Sys., Inc., (listing the elements of a promissory-estoppel claim) .
City of Waconia, Minn. 2021
Minn. 2021
Sys., Inc., (distinguishing between contract claims and promissory estoppel claims and suggesting that the latter generally require a showing of good faith reliance to prevail); see generally Mark Pettit, Jr., Modern Unilateral Contracts , 63 B.U.
Christina Ginther v. Enzuri Group, LLC, et al. on Related Appeal, Independent Women’s Football League on Related Appeal Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sys., Inc., see also Melrose Gates, (“Generally, litigants have no right to a jury trial on the merits of equitable claims, and traditionally the judge serves as the trier of fact for such claims.”).
Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al v. Ivy Tower Minneapolis LLC, et al. Respondents, Wischermann Holdings, LLC, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
J. Paul Robinson v. University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Sys., Inc., 153 (Minn. 2001); (discussing confusion concerning nature of theories of relief and nature of remedies), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Kristin M. Schumacher, Marian V. Swanson, intervenor v. Terrence K. Swanson, and Terrence K. Swanson, counterclaimant, vs. Kristin … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sys., Inc ., ( quoting Whallon v. Bancroft , 4 Minn. 109 , 111, 4 Gil.
Shari Flanagan v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sys., Inc. , and a person is not entitled to unemployment benefits on an equitable or common law basis.
Mavco, Inc. d/b/a Maverick Construction Company v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mavco, Inc. d/b/a Maverick Construction Company v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sys., Inc., United Prairie Bank v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Javinsky v. Commissioner of Administration 725 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Javinsky v. Commissioner of Administration 725 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. Norman 696 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2005
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. Norman 696 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2005
Sys., Inc., see also Christensen, d at 749 (quoting from Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (1981)).
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Norman v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm 681 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Norman v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm 681 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002