Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Davies v. West Publishing Co., 622 N.W.2d 836.

51 citing documents.

Jon Huseth, et al., d/b/a Clay View Dairy, LLP, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (Federal Employers’ Liability Act); Davies v. West Publ’g Co., -42 (Minn. App. 2001) (breach of fiduciary duty), rev. denied (Minn. May 29, 2001); (medical malpractice), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Minn. 2023
See Franklin, 2022 WL 1765955, at *2 ( (“The continuing violation doctrine is most commonly applied in [employment] discrimination cases involving wrongful acts that manifest over a period of time, rather than in a series of discrete acts.”), rev. denied (Minn. May 29, 2001) ; –31
Bryan Leslie Franklin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., rev. denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
William M. Ross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
11 “The continuing violation doctrine is most commonly applied in discrimination cases involving wrongful acts that manifest over a period of time, rather than in a series of discrete acts.” Davies v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Jill Mungall, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 20 01).
Lewison v. Hutchinson 929 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Lewison v. Hutchinson 929 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , , 841 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State 927 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State 927 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cocchiarella v. Driggs , , 624 (Minn. 2016) ; Davies v. W. Publ'g Co. , , 841 (Minn. App. 2001) (stating that district court's decision following application of a statute to undisputed facts is not binding on this court), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Julie Tossey, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
trine is most commonly applied in employment discrimination cases “ when the discriminatory acts of an employer over a period of time indicate a systematic repetition of the same policy and constitute a sufficiently integrated pattern to form, in effect, a single discriminatory act.” Hubbard v. United Press Int ’l, Inc., n.11 (Minn. 1983) ; see Davies v. W. Pub l’g Co. , (stating that continuing - violation doctrine is most commonly applied in discrimination cases because those types 9 of cases
Jason Rhoades, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co. , , review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001); see also Ill.
Green v. Kellen 921 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Green v. Kellen 921 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Davies v. W. Publ'g Co. , , 841 (Minn. App. 2001) (citing Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc. , , 856 (Minn. 1998) ), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Chester Vernon Jones, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
First, Minnesota courts have applied the continuing-violation theory in employment-discrimination cases, in part, because these claims “involve[e] wrongful acts that manifest over a period of time, rather than in a series of discrete acts.” Davies v. West 9 Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Allan H. Zuehlsdorf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co. , review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Clark v. Connor 843 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Clark v. Connor 843 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
In re the Estate of Rutt 824 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Estate of Rutt 824 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Northern States Power Co. ex rel. Board of Directors v. Aleckson 819 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Northern States Power Co. ex rel. Board of Directors v. Aleckson 819 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision *715 is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Allen v. BURNET REALTY, LLC 784 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Allen v. BURNET REALTY, LLC 784 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
P. 56.03: “Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power 776 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power 776 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Losen v. Allina Health System 767 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Losen v. Allina Health System 767 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
2007); Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Look Ex Rel. Dehen v. Pact Charter School 763 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Look Ex Rel. Dehen v. Pact Charter School 763 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., (citing Lefio v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., ), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
A & L POTATO CO. v. Aggregate Industries 759 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
A & L POTATO CO. v. Aggregate Industries 759 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.” Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., (citing Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., ), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.C.M. 758 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.C.M. 758 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., (“Application of a statute to the undisputed facts of a case involves a question of law, and the district court’s decision is not binding on this court.”) (citing Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enters., Inc., ), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Davies v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co., (rejecting continuing violation doctrine and distinguishing continuing course of conduct from separate distinct acts), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001); see, (continuing worker’s compensation violations), rev
Miernicki v. Duluth Curling Club 699 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Miernicki v. Duluth Curling Club 699 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., (addressing the denial of summary judgment on a statute of limitations issue).
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Davies v. West Publ’g Co., rev. denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 668 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2003