Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kolton v. County of Anoka, 645 N.W.2d 403.
- Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Gee v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 700 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Gee v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities
700 N.W.2d 548
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-08 (Minn.2002) (applying interpretation of ADA to MHRA).
- County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State 685 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State 685 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Garcia 683 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2004
-
State v. Garcia
683 N.W.2d 294
Minn. 2004
Kolton v. *299 County of Anoka
- State v. Benniefield 678 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2004
-
State v. Benniefield
678 N.W.2d 42
Minn. 2004
2(4), will be presumed to be constitutional and should be sustained “if the classification drawn by it is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest.”
- Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church
679 N.W.2d 350
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(statutory interpretation); (subject matter jurisdiction).
- Podruch v. State, Department of Public Safety 674 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Podruch v. State, Department of Public Safety
674 N.W.2d 252
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating that Minnesota courts may depart in interpretations when provisions of state and federal laws are not similar).
- Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1
668 N.W.2d 227
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“If a constitutional challenge involves neither a suspect classification nor a fundamental right, we review the challenge under a rational basis standard....”
- State v. Gresser 657 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
State v. Gresser
657 N.W.2d 875
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Under both the United States and Minnesota Constitutions, “[i]f a constitutional challenge involves neither a suspect classification nor a fundamental right, we review the challenge under a rational basis standard.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Frazier 649 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2002