Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Amos, 658 N.W.2d 201.

489 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Johnathan Bernard Edwards Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki 880 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki 880 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Johnathan Bernard Edwards Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the [district] court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION I. “Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” 4 (Minn. 2003).
State of Minnesota v. Erik Demetrius White, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nammoun Khampanya Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nammoun Khampanya Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” d 201, 203 (Minn. 2003).
State of Minnesota v. Erik Demetrius White, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Shane Michener Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sheldon James Armstrong, III Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sheldon James Armstrong, III Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Shane Michener Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Anthony Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jamison Brewer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Anthony Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jamison Brewer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Arne Henry Mahlberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Arne Henry Mahlberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the [district] court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted); –60 (Minn. App. 2010) (reviewing admission of a sexual-abuse victim’s extrajudicial statements for abuse of discretion).
State of Minnesota v. Deontray Vershon Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John F. Bonner, III Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Deontray Vershon Tate Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John F. Bonner, III Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sherman Peak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sherman Peak Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Emem Ufot Udoh Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Emem Ufot Udoh Minn. Ct. App. 2016
When challenging an evidentiary ruling, the appellant must show both that the district court abused its discretion and that the appellant “was thereby prejudiced.”
State of Minnesota v. William James Holisky, II Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William James Holisky, II Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cartrell Ismail Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Mirkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cartrell Ismail Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the [district] court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Mirkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of 8 establishing that the trial court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. D. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lonnie Bell Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. D. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lonnie Bell Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ryan James Sabot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Evidentiary rulings rest within the sound discretion of the [district] court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian James Liimatta Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian James Liimatta Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On appeal, the appellant has the burden of establishing that the [district] court abused its discretion and that appellant was thereby prejudiced.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Perry Paczkowski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Marquette Rowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015