Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Collins, 655 N.W.2d 652.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“If the conduct of any driver does frustrate the process, it will amount to refusal to test.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
amount to refusal to test.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
If a driver’s actions “frustrate the testing process,” then “it will amount to refusal to test.” (determining that a driver’s swearing, threats, and belligerent shouts frustrated the testing process and concluding that conduct that frustrates the testing process amounts to a refusal to test), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
If a driver’s actions “frustrate” the testing process, then “it will amount to refusal to test.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We have recognized that the implied-consent law imposes on a driver a requirement to act in a manner so as not to frustrate the testing process.” State v. Collins , rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 652, 658 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
If a driver’s actions “frustrate” the testing process, then “it will amount to refusal to test.” State v. Collins , (citing Busch v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
10 review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Collins , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Brian Allen Platt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Collins , , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Eduardo Rubio-Galarza, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, (upholding refusal when driver was unc ooperative during the advisory reading), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Grant Jason Bresnahan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Grant Jason Bresnahan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Once the facts are established, the reviewing court makes a legal determination as to whether the defendant ‘was accorded a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel based on the given facts.’” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he implied-consent law imposes on a driver a requirement to act in a manner so as not to frustrate the testing process.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Wasche, III Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Wasche, III Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. March 26, 2003).
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Suzanne Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Safety, (applying Busch in a case of criminal test refusal), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Ferrier 792 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ferrier 792 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(driver’s disruptive behavior during the implied-consent procedure “amounted to a retraction of her request to contact an attorney”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Johnson 743 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Johnson 743 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
And this court “cannot add to a statute what the legislature purposely omits or inadvertently overlooks.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Adickes 741 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Adickes 741 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Mar.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by