Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Filippi, 335 N.W.2d 739.

126 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
requires that trial courts admit such evidence of bad acts only when (1) the evidence is relevant and material to the state’s case, (2) the evidence of the defendant’s participation in the act is clear and convincing, and (3) the probative character of the evidence outweighs its potential for unfair preju
State v. Olson 459 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Olson 459 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Cichon 458 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
Seelye v. State 429 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Seelye v. State 429 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. Redding 422 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1988
State v. Redding 422 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1988
1, for intentionally aiding and abetting another in the commission of a crime is also liable, under subdivision 2, "for any other crime committed in pursuance of the intended crime if reasonably foreseeable by the person as a probable consequence of committing or attempting to commit the crime intended.” -43 (Minn.1983) (holding burglar liable for assaults committed by accomplice during commission of burglary).
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Axford 417 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1987
State v. Axford 417 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1987
State v. Ostlund 416 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Dixon 415 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Dixon 415 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Peterson 411 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Peterson 411 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Crocker 409 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1987
State v. Crocker 409 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1987
we stated: “In determining relevancy, we have generally required that the other crime be similar in some way — either in time, location, or modus operandi —to the charged offense, although this, of course, is not an absolute necessity.” In the instant case, the conclusion that the .
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Irwin v. State 400 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Irwin v. State 400 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-44 (Minn.1983); Minn.R.Evid.
State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Perez 397 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1986
State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Aligah v. State 394 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” In applying this rule, the “preferred approach” is to “analyze the evidence and determine if the evidence is relevant and material to the state’s case, if the evidence of the defendant’s participation in the offense is clear and convincing, and if the probative character of the evidence outweighs its potential for unfair prejudice.”
State v. Nutt 381 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Nutt 381 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985