Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen, 392 N.W.2d 520.

81 citing documents.

Erickson v. Fullerton 619 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Specialized Tours, , 536 n. 15 (Minn.1986) (reviewing constitutionality of statute despite procedural flaws in notice).
Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Follett 601 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Follett 601 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
1933, 1941 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983), quoted in Specialized Tours
Fawcett v. Heimbach 591 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Fawcett v. Heimbach 591 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
1933, 1938 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983); Specialized Tours
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 461 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 461 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1990
See Thill v. Modern Erecting Co., 284 Minn. 508, 513, 515 , -70 (1969) (providing a safeguard to a wife’s loss of consortium action, because of the “danger of double recovery”); see also Specialized Tours, 533, 537 (Minn.1986) (noting evidence supported all three theories of liability, but double recovery not allowed); (jury to be instructed to limit award for wife’s loss of consortium to only those damages sustained over and above those included in husband’s awar
Schmidt v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schmidt v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Specialized Tours, -43 (Minn.1986) (degree of success is key factor in attorney fee awards).
Opatz v. John G. Kinnard and Co., Inc. 454 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Opatz v. John G. Kinnard and Co., Inc. 454 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing Specialized Tours, ).
State v. Sorenson 441 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1989
State v. Sorenson 441 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1989
1426 , 75 L.Ed.2d 787 (1983); Specialized Tours, , 536 n. 15 (Minn.1986).
Davis v. Midwest Discount Securities, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Davis v. Midwest Discount Securities, Inc. 439 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
§ 80A.01(b) (1988); Specialized Tours
Foley v. Allard 427 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1988
Foley v. Allard 427 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1988
Black v. NuAire, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Black v. NuAire, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Defense counsel have cited Specialized Tours, and Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct.
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
See also Specialized Tours, Shephard v. City of St.
Sit v. T & M PROPERTIES 408 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sit v. T & M PROPERTIES 408 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kovatovich v. Barnett 406 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1987
Kovatovich v. Barnett 406 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by