Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen, 392 N.W.2d 520.

81 citing documents.

Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Under that method, once the party claiming attorney fees has been determined to be the prevailing party, “the starting point in determining a reasonable fee is ascertainment of the number of adequately documented hours expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” 6 Specialized Tours, (citing Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983)).
Daniel Hatlevig, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
For fraud, the plaintiff must establish, among other elements, that “there was a false representation by a party of a past or existing material fact susceptible of knowledge.” Specialized Tours, d 520, 532 (Minn. 1986).
David Timp, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
6 See Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen , -43 6 Timp and Anderly note that the Gibbses sought an attorney fees award in the amount of $81,220 in their motion for summary judgment.
Scott H. Lansing, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Commissioner Of Transportation v. Krause 925 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2019
Commissioner Of Transportation v. Krause 925 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2019
We adopted the lodestar method three years after Hensley in Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen , , 542-43 (Minn. 1986), a securities case.
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
To determine the quantum meruit value of Faricy's services, the district court attempted to use two different methods of calculation: (1) the lodestar method, which focuses on evidence of the hours worked, see Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen , , 542 (Minn. 1986) (adopting the United States Supreme Court's lodestar approach); see also Minn. Gen.
Michael N. Palm, Sr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Specialized Tours v. Hagen , (giving elements of misrepresentation).
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
*558 See Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen , , 533 (Minn. 1986) ; see also McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson , 776 F.2d 767 , 770 (8th Cir. 1985) ("[C]ourts agree that fraud in inducing a contract and a later breach of that contract represent two distinct causes of action under Minnesota law.").
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court may conclude that evidence supports both claims of common-law fraud and breach of warranty, so long as the appellant is not allowed “double recovery.” Specialized Tours
Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc. 863 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul v. Angeles, (A14-1149), Charlene Mead, (A14-1150), Charles Starovasnik, Jr., (A14-1151), Trudy Marse, (A14-1152), Rebecca Manuel, (A14-1153), Claude … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc. 863 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul v. Angeles, (A14-1149), Charlene Mead, (A14-1150), Charles Starovasnik, Jr., (A14-1151), Trudy Marse, (A14-1152), Rebecca Manuel, (A14-1153), Claude … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Debra Jean Johnson, a/k/a Debra J. Johnson, Great Lakes … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Debra Jean Johnson, a/k/a Debra J. Johnson, Great Lakes … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Specialized Tours, -42 (Minn. 1986) (citing Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 1940 (1983)).
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, e.g., Specialized Tours, (addressing breach-of-warranty claim based on seller’s alleged failure to include certain account payable items in business balance sheet).
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
of City of Brainerd, (listing the elements of a negligent misrepresentation claim); Specialized Tours, (listing the elements of a fraud claim).
County of Dakota v. Cameron 839 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2013
County of Dakota v. Cameron 839 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2013
See, e.g., Green v. BMW of N. Am., LLC, -36 (Minn.2013) (lemon law); Milner, d at 620-24 (Fair Labor Standards Act); Anderson, d at 628-30 (Human Rights Act); Specialized Tours, (Securities Act).
Green v. BMW of North America, LLC 826 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2013
Green v. BMW of North America, LLC 826 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2013
See Specialized Tours, (adopting the Supreme Court’s lodestar approach to reasonable attorney fees under civil rights statutes as a “sensible and fair approach” to determine reasonable attorney fees under the Minnesota Securities Act (citing Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct.
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of Maple Grove v. Marketline Construction Capital, LLC 802 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Specialized Tours, (stating that a required element of fraud is that a party relies on the fraudulent action); Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 122 , (identifying reliance as a required element of negligent misrepresentation); Deli v. Univ.
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 795 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 2011
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 795 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 2011
Cf. Specialized Tours, (“When a business is sold through a stock transfer, the buyer assumes not only the assets of the corporation, but also the liabilities.”).
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
10 See Specialized Tours, (adopting process set forth in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct.
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Specialized Tours, (“When a business is sold through a stock transfer, the buyer assumes not only the assets of the corporation, but also the liabilities.”).
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen, *857 (stating elements of fraud claim to include false representation of material fact and detrimental reliance).
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co., -57 (Minn.1990) (relying on Gronquist to determine that partial satisfaction did not preclude recovery from another joint tortfeasor); Specialized Tours, (stating intent of the release of other joint tortfeasors is a key factor in determining liability); Luxenburg, d at 807-08 (applying Gronquist).
Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 748 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 2008
Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 748 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 2008
See Specialized Tours, (characterizing the procedure set forth by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. *621 Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct.
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 736 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2007
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 736 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2007
Flynn v. American Home Products Corp. 627 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Flynn v. American Home Products Corp. 627 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Erickson v. Fullerton 619 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2000