Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist, 338 N.W.2d 560.

87 citing documents.

In re the Estate of Oria Albert Brinkmeier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Estate of Oria Albert Brinkmeier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See AFSCME, Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, Minn. R. Civ.
Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol 9 N.W.3d 368 Minn. 2024
Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol 9 N.W.3d 368 Minn. 2024
of Minn., –02 (Minn. 1993) (stating that if the Legislature intended the Veterans Preference Act to apply to the University of Minnesota, it likely would have included the University by specific reference); AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist, –68 (Minn. 1983) (holding that the Legislature’s promise to give pension benefits to public employees was not an implied-in- D-9 The majority’s claim that strictly applying section 645.27 would nullify the statute’s “no doubt” clause is similarly
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Minn. 2020
To assemble the three-part test, Loew pulled together different “principles” and “fundamental rule[s]” th at we had applied in even 31 represent different ways of stating the same analysis.” d 767, 770 n.2 (Minn. 1986); see also AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist , –70, 570 n.12 (Minn. 1983) (“Although we have expressed this standard in various ways, the preeminent expression of rationality analysis under the equal protection clause is the requirement that legislative classifications ma
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist, - 69 (Minn. 1983) (discussing promissory estoppel).
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
accord Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 302 , 113 S.Ct.
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
“It is recognized that contractual rights are a form of property within the meaning of the due process clause.” AFSCME, Councils 6, II, 65
Minnesota-Osseo v. Independent School District 279 742 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Minnesota-Osseo v. Independent School District 279 742 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
AFSCME Council 6 v. Sundquist
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
AFSCME Council 6 v. Sundquist, (stating that quo warranto petition seeking to prevent enforcement of legislation increasing government employees’ existing contribution to pension funds did not “fit[ ] within the nature of quo warranto”).
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. Norman 696 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2005
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. Norman 696 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2005
AFSCME Councils 6, lA, 65 & 96
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist, appeal dismissed sub nom., Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n v. Sundquist, 466 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct.
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 591 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Peterson v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 591 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
See AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96, -69 (Minn.1983) (promissory estoppel); Davis v. Re-Trac Mfg., Corp., 276 Minn. 116, 117 , -39 (1967) (fraud).
Skeen v. State 505 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1993
Skeen v. State 505 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1993
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist, , 569 n. 11 (Minn. 1983), appeal dismissed, 466 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct.
Mitchell v. Steffen 504 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1993
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
AFSCME Council 6 v. Sundquist, Herron v. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc., pet.
Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'n v. State 490 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'n v. State 490 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist
Rice v. Connolly 488 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1992
Rice v. Connolly 488 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1992
See, e.g., AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New Brighton 487 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See AFSCME Council 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of Mower 483 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1992
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of Mower 483 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1992
Although the issue in AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist, was the validity of an act which required public employees to contribute an additional 2% of salary to pension funds, the Sundquist decision addressed fundamental concerns over retirement issues in the public sector, some of which are implicated in the present controversy.
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance 479 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1991
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist, appeal dismissed sub nom., Minneapolis Police Relief Assn. v. Sundquist, 466 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
We have our state constitution and in interpreting our state equal protection clause, “we are not bound by federal court interpretation of the federal equal protection clause.” AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96 v. Sundquist, (Yetka, J., dissenting).
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1991
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1991
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist
State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 460 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 460 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
AFSCME Councils 6, U, 65 & 96
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc. 460 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
XIV; see also AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96 v. Sundquist
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French 460 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1990
K.E. v. Hoffman 452 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
K.E. v. Hoffman 452 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 and 96

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by