Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54.

207 citing documents.

Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Janine Tea v. Ramsey County, Self-Insured, Relator Minn. 2024
Janine Tea v. Ramsey County, Self-Insured, Relator Minn. 2024
To be manifestly contrary to the evidence, the evidence must “clearly require[] reasonable minds to adopt a contrary conclusion.” Lagasse, d at 202; d 54, 61 (Minn. 1984).
Neomi Schmidt, Minn. 2023
Deangelo Profit, Minn. 2023
We will not disturb these findings unless, “viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the findings, it appears that the findings are manifestly contrary to the evidence or that it is clear reasonable minds would adopt a contrary conclusion.” Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees
Minn. 2022
Dennis Sershen, Minn. 2022
We will disturb the findings “only if, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the findings, it appears that the findings are manifestly contrary to the evidence or that it is clear reasonable minds would adopt a contrary conclusion.”
Margaret Leuthard, Minn. 2021
When reviewing a compensation judge’s decision, the WCCA is required to defer to the compensation judge’s findings of fact unless those findings are unsupported “by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted.” Hengemuhle v. Long 9 Prairie Jaycees
In the Matter of the License of Herman Thompson, M.Eq., L.P. License No. LP2769 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, e.g., Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees , -60 (Minn. 1984); In re Appeal of Rochelau , -92 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Dec.
Roller-Dick v. Centracare Health Sys. 916 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc. 910 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2018
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees , , 60 (Minn. 1984).
A17-1096 Minn. 2018
Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores 898 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2017
Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores 898 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2017
When the WCCA substitutes its own findings for those of the compensation judge, we first determine “whether the [WCCA] was correct in setting aside the compensation judge’s findings.”
Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
Kubis v. Community Memorial Hospital Ass'n 897 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 2017
Kubis v. Community Memorial Hospital Ass'n 897 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 2017
Specifically, when we review a decision by the WCCA, we “will intrude only if, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the findings, it appears that the findings are manifestly contrary to the evidence or that it is clear reasonable minds would adopt a contrary conclusion.” Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie *260 Jaycees
Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
ANALYSIS The WCCA is a “specialized agency of the executive branch, its members selected for their experience and expertise.”
Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health … 889 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2017
Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health … 889 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2017
On appellate review, if “more than one inference may reasonably be drawn from the evidence, the findings of the compensation judge are to be upheld.”
Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co. 869 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2015
Schuette v. City of Hutchinson 843 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2014
Schuette v. City of Hutchinson 843 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2014
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
The WCCA is a “specialized agency of the executive branch, its members selected for their experience and expertise,” and is entrusted with deciding “all questions of law and fact arising under the workers’ compensation laws of the state in those cases that have been appealed to the [WCCA].” Minn.Stat.
Washek v. New Dimensions Home Health 828 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2013
Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2007
Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2007
Zwieg v. Pope Douglas Solid Waste 704 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Zwieg v. Pope Douglas Solid Waste 704 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Varda v. Northwest Airlines Corp. 692 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2005
Varda v. Northwest Airlines Corp. 692 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2005
Busch v. Advanced Maintenance 659 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 2003
Busch v. Advanced Maintenance 659 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 2003
Turek v. NORTHFIELD FREEZINGS 652 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2002
Turek v. NORTHFIELD FREEZINGS 652 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2002
Alcozer v. North Country Food Bank 635 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Alcozer v. North Country Food Bank 635 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Pelowski v. K-Mart Corp. 627 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2001
Pelowski v. K-Mart Corp. 627 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2001
Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32 613 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 2000
Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32 613 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 2000
“It is not the function of this court to weigh the evidence to find facts to meet our preference.” Dille, d at 681 ().
Middleton Ex Rel. Middleton v. Northwest Airlines 600 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1999
Borchert v. American Spirits Graphics 582 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1998
Borchert v. American Spirits Graphics 582 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1998
Bruns v. City of St. Paul 555 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1996