Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54.

207 citing documents.

Marose v. Maislin Transport 413 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1987
1, is nevertheless applicable in this case because “the workers’ compensation law in effect at the time of injury governs, absent a clear manifestation of legislative intent to the contrary.” see Leahy v. St.
Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co. 412 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1987
Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co. 412 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1987
Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1987
Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1987
Kirchner v. County of Anoka 410 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1987
Kirchner v. County of Anoka 410 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1987
Salmon v. Wheelabrator Frye 409 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1987
Salmon v. Wheelabrator Frye 409 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1987
Hoffman v. Gopher State Silica 404 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1987
Hoffman v. Gopher State Silica 404 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1987
Jacobowitch v. Bell & Howell 404 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1987
Jacobowitch v. Bell & Howell 404 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1987
Schroeder v. Highway Services 403 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1987
Schroeder v. Highway Services 403 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1987
Gutz v. Honeywell, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1987
Gutz v. Honeywell, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1987
Parker/Lindberg v. Friendship Village 395 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1986
Parker/Lindberg v. Friendship Village 395 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1986
Jaeger v. 3M Co. 393 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1986
Jaeger v. 3M Co. 393 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1986
Woehler v. Packaging Corp. of America 386 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1986
Woehler v. Packaging Corp. of America 386 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1986
Rath v. Perlman Rocque Co. 384 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1986
Rath v. Perlman Rocque Co. 384 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1986
Meyering v. Wessels 383 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1986
Meyering v. Wessels 383 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1986
Therefore, in affirming, the majority of the Workers’
Hodge v. Hodge Construction 376 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1985
Hodge v. Hodge Construction 376 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1985
The WCCA substituted its own contrary determination, and when the decision was first reviewed by this court, we remanded so that the WCCA could reconsider the compensation judge’s
Theorin v. Ditec Corp. 377 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1985
Gornick v. Gillette Co. 376 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1985
Theorin v. Ditec Corp. 377 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1985
Gornick v. Gillette Co. 376 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1985
Radermecher v. FMC Corp. 375 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1985
Radermecher v. FMC Corp. 375 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1985
Schroeder ex rel. Schroeder v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1985
Schroeder ex rel. Schroeder v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1985
That tribunal is of course constrained by the 1983 amendments concerning its appellate review function to affirm a compensation judge’s findings unless they were not supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record, and Murphy contends here that the WCCA erred in substituting its own findings because the compensation judge’s findings did have the requisite evidentiary support.
Woelfel v. Plastics, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1985
Woelfel v. Plastics, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1985
Ledford v. Midland Electric & American Home Assurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1985
Odenthal v. Nordeast Carpet Service, Inc. 365 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1985
Odenthal v. Nordeast Carpet Service, Inc. 365 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1985
Ledford v. Midland Electric & American Home Assurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1985
Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1985
Cavanaugh v. Frederick Willys, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1985
Cavanaugh v. Frederick Willys, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1985
little evidence was furnished to show how employee could translate a theoretical capacity for work into an actual job.
Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1985
(Minn., filed November 21, 1984).
Nord v. City of Cook 360 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1985
Nord v. City of Cook 360 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1985
this court set forth the standard of review the WCCA should apply under the 1983 amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Act: The court of appeals can no longer disregard the compensation judge’s findings and order.
Hanson v. Special School District No. 1 359 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1984