Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mattsen v. Packman, 358 N.W.2d 48.

58 citing documents.

Jeffrey James Nathe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Donald Sealock, derivatively on behalf of St. Michael Mall, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
dicata provides that “[a] judgment on the merits 7 constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privies, not only as to ev ery matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated therein.” ( (emphasis removed)), review denied (Minn. June 29, 1988).
650 North Main Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See generally Kern v. Janson , d 48 (Minn. 1984).
Dwaine C. Ratfield, Kathleen M. Ratfield, individually and as trustees of the Dwaine and Kathleen Ratfield Living Trust … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kern v. Janson 800 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2011
Kern v. Janson 800 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2011
contact with an attorney before initiating a conciliation court action does not preclude a district court from vacating a conciliation court judgment under Minn. R. Civ.
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 619 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2000
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 619 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2000
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
a case relied on in Percy .
Porta-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. First Insurance East Grand Forks 512 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Porta-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. First Insurance East Grand Forks 512 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
The judgment arising out of the declaratory action operates as an adjudication upon the merits as to every matter actually litigated and “also as to every matter which might have been litigated.” (quoting Youngstown, 266 Minn, at 466, 124 *d at 340); see also Howe v. Nelson, 271 Minn. 296, 302-03 , (a declaratory judgment is a final decision on the merits which can have res judica-ta effect).
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992
Benson v. Hackbarth 481 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Benson v. Hackbarth 481 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(emphasis in original), pet.
Arbitration Between Charboneau v. American Family Insurance Co. 481 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1992
Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co. 481 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1992
Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co. 481 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1992
308, 309 (1885) (municipal court); (conciliation court).
Arbitration Between Charboneau v. American Family Insurance Co. 481 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1992
Hennepin County v. Hanneman 472 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hennepin County v. Hanneman 472 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
A second suit on the same cause of action is barred “not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated therein.” (emphasis in original) (), pet.
Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co. 438 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co. 438 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second action for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privies * * (cited in H.J., pet.
Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co. 437 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co. 437 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sunrise Electric, Inc. v. Zachman Homes, Inc. 425 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sunrise Electric, Inc. v. Zachman Homes, Inc. 425 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Because the doctrine of res judicata forecloses retrial not only of issues which were actually litigated, but every issue which might have been litigated, the first element required for the application of res judicata is satisfied.
Wessling v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wessling v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sundberg v. Abbott 423 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sundberg v. Abbott 423 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Minnesota Supreme Court has observed that “the statement of the principle [of res judicata] has remained unchanged since before the turn of the century.”
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Corp. 420 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Corp. 420 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 414 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1987
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 414 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1987
Jorissen v. Miller 399 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1987
Jorissen v. Miller 399 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1987
Haukland v. Peterson 396 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Haukland v. Peterson 396 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court held that a conciliation court judgment extinguishes all claims, including a subsequent damage claim.
Jorissen v. Miller 386 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Jorissen v. Miller 386 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellants contend that the present case is barred by res judicata
Lemkau v. Fout 385 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lemkau v. Fout 385 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court indicated that the failure of a personal injury claim to exceed the no-fault threshold, Minn.Stat.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Orr 379 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Orr 379 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1985