Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc., 376 N.W.2d 209.

23 citing documents.

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Penney Co., Inc., d 209, 215 (Minn. 1985).
Calm Waters, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Penney Co., –17 (Minn. 1985).
Derby Construction, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bethany Good, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Penney Co., (emphasis added).
In re the Appeal from the Order of the Joint Board of Kandiyohi and Meeker Counties Establishing a … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Penney Co., -17 (Minn. 1985).
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Penney Co., -15 (Minn.1985)).
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin 707 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Smith v. Woodwind Homes, Inc. 605 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Smith v. Woodwind Homes, Inc. 605 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Schluter v. United Farmers Elevator 479 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Schluter v. United Farmers Elevator 479 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Penney Co., Inc., , 217 (Minn.1985).
McIntosh v. Davis 441 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1989
McIntosh v. Davis 441 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1989
Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 430 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Penney Co., Inc., , 215 (Minn.1985).
Bogatzki v. Hoffman 430 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Penney Co., Inc., , 215 (Minn.1985).
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg 426 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Penney Co., Inc., the supreme court established a two-part test for determining whether to grant a motion for a continuance under Rule 56.06 when the party seeking more time is doing so because of insufficient time to conduct discovery.
Kissner v. Norton 412 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Penney Co., Inc., , 216-17 (Minn.1985) ().
BIXLER BY BIXLER v. Avondale Mills 405 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
FACTS The complete procedural history of this case is set forth in Bixler by Bixler v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.
Johnson v. Brown 401 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
settlement agreement does not contain a Pierringer release, but merely a covenant not to sue, the general rule is that the “release of one alleged tortfeasor will release all others if the settlement agreement manifests such an intent, or if the plaintiff received full compensation in law or in fact for damages sought against the remaining tortfeasors.” Bixler by Bixler v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc., , 214-15 (Minn.1985) (-08 (Minn.1977)) (emphasis added).