DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 363 N.W.2d 911.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    914 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. May 1, 1985).
  • State v. Cao 788 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Cao 788 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 2010
    provided the prosecutor with “notice that it is not appropriate to read the jury a statute or inform [the jury] of law unless the issue is properly decided by the district court.” Second, Cao argues that the prosecutor misstated the law, .relying for support on a published court of appeals’ decision
  • State v. Suhon 742 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Suhon 742 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    (affirming appellant’s conviction for first-degree intrafamilial sexual abuse, now incorporated into Minn.Stat.
  • In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    See Johnson, d at 388 (holding where the challenged instruction was considered in conjunction with the district court’s proper instruction of the jury on the state’s burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, there was no prejudicial error); (concluding that although the corroboration instruction was error, there was no prejudice considering the court’s instructions in their entirety), review denied (Minn. May 1,1985).
  • State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (noting particular time not an element of offense), review denied (Minn. May 1, 1985); (allowing the state to charge multiple acts of sexual abuse over an unspecified period of time where defendant availed herself of discovery opportunities).
  • State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    review denied (Minn. May 1, 1985).
  • Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Ruberg v. State 428 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dupay 405 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Dupay 405 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    pet for rev. denied, (Minn. May 1, 1985).
  • State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Mathews 400 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Mathews 400 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    which both indicate that a prosecutor should never allude to defendant’s failure to testify.
  • State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    which both indicate that a prosecutor should never allude to defendant’s failure to testify.
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Trimble 371 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Trimble 371 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Brown 368 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Brown 368 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    (jury instruction that testimony of complainant in sexual assault need not be corroborated not reversible error where jury was properly instructed on the burden of proof).