Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stephani, 369 N.W.2d 540.

32 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
18, 1988); d 401 (Minn. 2024).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Baker, III Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Baker, III Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, 14 (concluding that two references to “uncontroverted” evidence did not result in prejudice).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
at 429 ( rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A self-defense instruction “is needed only if appellant sufficiently raises the defense by creating or raising a reasonable doubt that [her] use of force was justified.” -47 (Minn. App. 1985) (affirming refusal to give self -defense instruction because appellant could not meet burden of production), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Stephani , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; see also State v. Stephani , (concluding that prosecutor ’s statement that a witness “told you what happened” was not misconduct), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Sedne Bonitaz Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sedne Bonitaz Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
if no additional or different offense is charged and if the defendant’s substantial rights are not prejudiced”); (approving of amendment to complaint during trial to conform to evidence), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(concluding record failed to show actual conflict of interest where, just before trial, defense lawyers learned another *33 attorney from office had previously represented victim in unrelated criminal cases while instant ease was pending), review denied, (Minn. Aug.
State v. Witucki 420 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Witucki 420 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Holscher 417 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Holscher 417 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nelson v. State 407 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. State 407 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Whaley 389 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Whaley 389 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Snyder 375 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Snyder 375 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gulbrandsen, 238 Minn. at 509 , d at 421
State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Bland, d at 383 ), pet.
State v. Vann 372 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Vann 372 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
We have cautioned against this “nit picking and reading a portion of the argument out of context” (citing State v. Gulbrandsen, 238 Minn. 508 , ).