Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom, 359 N.W.2d 634.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating 19 that an abuse of discretion will be found only if there is a “conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record”).
-
In re the Marriage of: Jonathon Henry Ortner, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Swa nstrom v. Swanstrom , , 636 (Minn. App. 1984) (stating that an abuse of discretion will be found only if there is a “conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record”).
- Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch
411 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
While it is within the trial court’s discretion to consider social security benefits, “failure to do so *266 [is] not an abuse of discretion.”
- Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild
410 N.W.2d 70
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“There must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts * * * before this court will find that the trial court abused its discretion.”
- Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Erdahl v. Erdahl
384 N.W.2d 566
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
this court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it failed to consider social security income in setting the amount of maintenance.
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Bateman v. Bateman 382 N.W.2d 240 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Griepp v. Griepp 381 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Griepp v. Griepp 381 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Bateman v. Bateman 382 N.W.2d 240 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Quick v. Quick 381 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Quick v. Quick 381 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Dicks v. Dicks 380 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Dicks v. Dicks
380 N.W.2d 156
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS Standard of Review In dissolution cases, the trial court has broad discretion in awarding spousal maintenance, dividing property, and awarding attorney’s fees.
- Marriage of Napier v. Napier 374 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Napier v. Napier 374 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen
368 N.W.2d 769
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(holding failure to consider future social security payments was not an abuse of discretion).