Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McClelland v. McClelland, 393 N.W.2d 224.

50 citing documents.

St. Paul Park Refining Co., LLC v. Brian Domeier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
St. Paul Park Refining Co., LLC v. Brian Domeier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. R. L. and J. L. D., … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Comm’rs, (noting that, generally, appellate courts apply the law in effect at the time they file their decision, unless doing so will alter vested rights or result in manifest injustice); - 27 (Minn. App. 1986) (making a similar observation about district courts), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- 27 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that this court applies the law currently in effect unless doing so would alter the matured rights of a party), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of: M. J. E. B. v. A. L. n/k/a A. T., E. G., C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: M. J. E. B. v. A. L. n/k/a A. T., E. G., C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-27 (Minn.App.1986) (indicating that appellate court applies current version of statute unless doing so alters matured or unconditional rights of parties or creates other injustice), review denied (Minn. Nov.
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-27 (Minn.App.1986) (indicating that the current version of a statute will be used unless it changes or alters a matured or unconditional right of the parties or creates some other injustice), review denied (Minn. Nov.
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
U.S. Home Corp. v. Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Airports Comm’n, 250 Minn. 130, 136 , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Frank-Bretwisch v. Ryan 741 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Frank-Bretwisch v. Ryan 741 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
of Comm’rs, -76 (Minn.2000); -27 (Minn.App.1986), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.M.L. 730 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.M.L. 730 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-27 (Minn.App.1986) (indicating that current version of statute will be used unless it changes or alters matured or unconditional right of parties or creates other injustice), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Malloy v. Commissioner of Human Services 657 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Malloy v. Commissioner of Human Services 657 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-27 (Minn.App.1986) (citing Bradley v. Sch.
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge 637 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge 637 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(issues determined on appeal “will not be relitigated in the trial court nor re-examined in a second appeal”); (appellate court decision on given issue establishes law of case that must be followed on remand to district court), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners 617 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2000
Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners 617 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2000
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Minnesota School Board Ass'n 600 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Minnesota School Board Ass'n 600 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-27 (Minn.App.1986), pet.
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Application of Q Petroleum 498 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Braatz v. Braatz 489 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Braatz v. Braatz 489 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-27 (Minn.App.1986) (citations omitted), pet.
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 457 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co. 457 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Services, Inc., 263 Minn. 152, 155 , , 269 (1962), cert.
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See State v. Chicago Great Western Railway, 222 Minn. at 511 , d at 298 (“There is no vested right in an action until final judgment has been entered therein.”); pet.
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 417 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 417 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson 410 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Erickson 409 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Erickson 409 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-27 (Minn Ct.App.1986), pet for rev. denied, (Minn. Nov.
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Halvorson v. Halvorson 402 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Halvorson v. Halvorson 402 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellant claims that an award of permanent maintenance is usually restricted to certain exceptional cases where there is little likelihood of the once-dependent spouse attaining self-sufficiency, appeal after remand