Cited by

(stating that the scope of review on appeal is generally limited to issues presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.’” (quotation omitted)).

(stating that a party cannot “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory”).

(stating that appellate courts generally consider only those issues previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(explaining that appellate courts will generally not consider an issue “if it was not passed on by the trial court” (quotation omitted)).

-83 (Minn. 1988) (stating that generally we will not consider matters outside the record on appeal or evidence not produced and received in the district court).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

Stone v. Invitation Homes, Inc., ().

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

App. P. 110.01 (defining the record on appeal)

As a general rule, an appellate court will consider and resolve “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”

(stating that appellate courts address only those questions previously presente d to and decide by the district court).