Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.

2745 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court “may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence [by the district court].” -83 (Minn. 1988).
James Adam Roth v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. L. C. and M. C., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Donald Hand 878 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger v. Brett Michael Werger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Washington County HRA v. Kuohsiou Huang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger v. Brett Michael Werger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Washington County HRA v. Kuohsiou Huang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that appellate review is generally limited to the issues and theories presented to and considered by the district court).
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I. v. Sheila Moore, Harry Walk Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I. v. Sheila Moore, Harry Walk Minn. Ct. App. 2016
App. P. 110.01 (“The documents filed in the trial court, the exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings, if any, shall constitute the record on appeal in all cases.”); –83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.”) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville 877 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge, et al v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(ruling that an appellate court will not consider matters not raised in or considered by the district court).
State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville 877 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(declining to address an alternative theory raised for the first time on appeal).
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge, et al v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
As the district court stated, appellants “acknowledge they do not have direct evidence of age discrimination, and they instead rely on the McDonnell Douglas indirect method.” “A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, Respondent 876 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2016
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, Respondent 876 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2016
“A reviewing court must generally consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’ ” (quoting Thayer v. Am.
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Renaye Kroells Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Renaye Kroells Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A party may not obtain appellate review “by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.”
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hennepin County, Mamie Jegbadai v. Gbenga Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Willie J. Bridgeforth, III, Susan J. Swanson v. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka Village Apartments Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Willie J. Bridgeforth, III, Susan J. Swanson v. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka Village Apartments Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hennepin County, Mamie Jegbadai v. Gbenga Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that appellate review is limited to those issues that were presented to and considered by the district court).
A15-1399 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).
A15-1399 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Francis Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Francis Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that appellate courts address only issues that were presented to and considered by the district court).
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).
Michael N. Palm, Sr. v. Calhoun Realty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D’Costa v. Joseph Francis D’Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Loria Quade v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Department of Employment and Economic Development … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First American Title Insurance Company v. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael N. Palm, Sr. v. Calhoun Realty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and 13 considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).
Loria Quade v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Department of Employment and Economic Development … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- 83 (Minn. 1988) (stating that an appellate court may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below).