Cited by

(declining to review argument raised for first time on appeal).

(stating that, generally, appellate courts address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

These arguments for relief were not raised to the district court and are therefore waived.2

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988).

But they waived this argument both because they did not raise it in the district court, see Woodruff, d at 13–14 (), and because they fail to identify any supporting constitutional principle on appeal, see Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519–20

App. P. 110.01 (“The documents filed in the trial court, the exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings, if any, shall constitute the record on appeal in all cases.”); –83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

(stating that, generally, appellate courts consider only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

As this argument has not been argued or briefed

(stating that, generally, appellate courts address only those questions presented to and considered by the district court).

“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” 17 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted).

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that, generally, appellate courts will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal).

d 580, 582-83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”); see also Minn. Stat. § 253D.28, subd.