Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.

2745 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. A. Y. G., a/k/a A. Y. L Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. A. Y. G., a/k/a A. Y. L Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph McManus Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph McManus Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The general rule is that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and we “will strike references to such matters from the parties’ briefs,” d 609, 613 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. July 19, 2005).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gassoway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Stuart Co., d/b/a Century North Apartments v. Ciera Ramsey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gassoway Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that an appellate court will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).
Stuart Co., d/b/a Century North Apartments v. Ciera Ramsey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that this court will not consider matters not properly raised or argued before the district court).
Gurvin Femrite, et al v. City of Lowry Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gurvin Femrite, et al v. City of Lowry Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).3 VI.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. L. and J. L. W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. L. and J. L. W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, an appellate court considers only “those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation 7 omitted).
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).
Mark W. Tibbals v. Kerry G. Tibbals Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Deborah Brakefield v. IND. School District #2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Deborah Brakefield v. IND. School District #2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that generally, appellate courts must consider only issues presented to and considered by the district court).
Mark W. Tibbals v. Kerry G. Tibbals Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “[a] reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Gina Marie Johnson, individually and on behalf of Mickey Steele Sullivan, et al v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of: Gina Marie Johnson, individually and on behalf of Mickey Steele Sullivan, et al v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gordon Emil Miles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
cf. Ince, d at 25 (remanding for findings on proposed less restrictive alternative, where the committed person had provided evidence showing that his treatment needs could be met with ongoing therapy, intensive supervision through the department of corrections, and treatment in the outp
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brenda Sue Loewen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that appellate courts generally address only questions presented to and considered by the district court).
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court); but see Watson v. United Servs.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brenda Sue Loewen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(applying Thiele in civil commitment context).
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese (A13-2152) (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd. (A13-2152) (A13-2160) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese (A13-2152) (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd. (A13-2152) (A13-2160) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that matters not argued to and considered by the district court are not reviewable).
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline V. Dorosh Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Brian Jeffrey Serber v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline V. Dorosh Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Therefore, the issue is not properly before us. Moreover, nothing in the record supports C.F.’s assertion that his counsel was not on the registry, and “[a]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal.” -83 (Minn. 1988).
Brian Jeffrey Serber v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
LaBeau v. Commissioner of Pub.
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).