Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.

2745 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B. 698 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating, generally, appellate courts do not address issues not presented and considered by district court); Midway, 306 Minn. at 356 , d at 78 (requiring party to show error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(holding that a party must bring a motion demonstrating “prejudice or implied or actual bias” if the party failed to remove the judge before trial), superceded by statute on other grounds, Minn.Stat.
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Middle River-Snake River Watershed District v. Dennis Drewes, Inc. 692 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
v. Wintz Parcel *92 Drivers, Inc., (determining that issue was not adequately briefed on appeal); -83 (Minn.1988) (refusing to resolve issue not raised in district court).
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (issue not adequately briefed on appeal); -83 (Minn.1988) (issue not raised in district court).
Minnesota Voyageur Houseboats, Inc. v. Las Vegas Marine Supply, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minnesota Voyageur Houseboats, Inc. v. Las Vegas Marine Supply, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Roth v. Weir 690 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Roth v. Weir 690 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating parties generally allowed to raise neither new issues nor new theories on appeal).
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Northern States Power Co. v. Gas Services, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Northern States Power Co. v. Gas Services, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
(stating that we generally review only issues presented to and considered by the trial court); see also Minn. R. Civ.App.
Magnuson v. Diekmann 689 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Magnuson v. Diekmann 689 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
P. 110.01; (this court does not *276 consider matters not presented to the district court).
In Re Ivey 687 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Ivey 687 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Thorson v. Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n 687 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Thorson v. Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n 687 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(appellate court must generally consider only matters argued before and decided by the district court); Edina Cmty.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan 687 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
23, 1990); (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).
Cederberg v. City of Inver Grove Heights 686 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Cederberg v. City of Inver Grove Heights 686 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners 682 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners 682 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Johnson v. Wright 682 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
P. 110.01; Thiele v. *411 Stich, -83 (Minn.1988) (an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence at the trial court).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P. 678 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P. 678 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
is raising it for the first time on appeal, we note that the March 11, 2002, order terminating T.J.S.'s parental rights to C.M.S.
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(appellate courts generally will not considered matters not argued and considered in court below).
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Estate of Handy 672 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Estate of Handy 672 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kolla 672 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating party may not, on appeal, switch to a new theory on an issue).
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating appellate courts do not address issues or theories not raised in the district court).
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by