Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.

2745 citing documents.

North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. 634 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating that reviewing court will generally not consider issues that were not presented to and considered by district court).
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats 633 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats 633 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating appellate courts do not address issues or theories not raised in district court); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971) (stating assignment of error based on mere assertion and unsupported by argument or authority waived unless
Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating, generally, appellate courts address only issues presented to and decided by district court, *747 party may not raise new issue on appeal, and party may not, on appeal, argue issue presented to district court on theory not presented to the district court.)
Marriage of Davis v. Davis 631 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Davis v. Davis 631 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See, , 842 n. 1 (Minn.App.2001) (declining to comment on the propriety of the assumption that the Hortis/Valento formula is proper in a joint physical custody case); (stating appellate courts generally address only issues presented to and decided by the district court).
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Application of Salah 629 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Application of Salah 629 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
110.01 (defining record on appeal as papers filed in district court, the exhibits, and the transcript, if any); -83 (Minn.1988) (stating reviewing court cannot base its decision on matters not submitted in evidence to district court).
J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M. 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jw v. Cm 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M. 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jw v. Cm 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(refusing to consider legal theories or arguments not previously raised).
Marriage of Duffney v. Duffney 625 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Duffney v. Duffney 625 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(appellate courts generally address only issues presented to and decided by the district court).
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Boatwright v. Budak 625 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Safety, review denied (Minn. May 18, 1999); (holding that issue raised below but argued under new theory on appeal is generally not renewable).
Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. Waddill 625 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. Waddill 625 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
P. 4.03(a): (holding attempted service on office receptionist did not confer jurisdiction, despite defendant's actual knowledge of suit).
State v. Joseph 622 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Joseph 622 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wear v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 621 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wear v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District 621 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(issues not raised in district court generally may not be considered for first time on appeal).
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Divine 672 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Friday 617 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Friday 617 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-83 (Minn.1988) (appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued and decided in court below).