Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580.

2745 citing documents.

Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 570 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1997
Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 570 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1997
Walker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 569 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Walker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 569 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(issues not raised in the district court cannot be considered for the first time on appeal).
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Loewen 565 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Loewen 565 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
P. 110.01 (record consists of papers filed in trial court, the exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings); (reviewing court will generally only consider matters presented and considered by district court).
Martin v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 566 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1997
Martin v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 566 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1997
P. 56.03; (placing the burden of demonstrating that no genuine issue of material fact exists for trial on the moving party).
Reese v. Brookdale Motors, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Reese v. Brookdale Motors, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(noting appellate court may review only those issues the record indicates were presented to and considered by the district court); Thayer v. American Fin.
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-83 (Minn.1988) (appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside of the record).
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Myron v. City of Plymouth 562 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Myron v. City of Plymouth 562 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(issues not raised in district court generally may not be considered for first time on appeal).
W v. Nelson Construction Co. v. City of Lindstrom 565 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
W v. Nelson Construction Co. v. City of Lindstrom 565 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that appellate courts may only address matters considered by district court).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(appellate court will address only issues presented to and considered by district court in deciding matter).
Sorenson v. Visser 558 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sorenson v. Visser 558 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(quoting Thayer v. American Fin.
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of Redwood Falls 558 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of Redwood Falls 558 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(court should not decide issue that was not decided by the district court).
Schoffman Ex Rel. Schoffman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 557 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Schoffman Ex Rel. Schoffman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 557 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-83 (Minn.1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal ⅜ ⅜ *.”).
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(citing Rehber *282 ger v. Project Plumbing Co., 295 Minn. 577, 578 , )
Rainbow Terrace, Inc. v. Hutchens 557 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rainbow Terrace, Inc. v. Hutchens 557 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(appellate court must generally only consider issues presented and considered by district court).
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Co., (regarding applicability of an exclusion clause in an insurance contract); (regarding assertion of a statute of limitations); Anderson v. First Nat’l Bank of Pine City, 303 Minn. 408, 411 , (regarding ratification of a mortgage).
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
(explaining that a reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record demonstrates have been presented and considered below).
Hotchkiss v. Commissioner of Public Safety 553 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Press v. City of Minneapolis 553 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hotchkiss v. Commissioner of Public Safety 553 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
ieve testing was available only at a hospital and only from persons who would surely require an absurd sum of money for the service.” Appellant did not present this issue to the trial court, nor does the record show that the trial court considered it; we must refuse to do so for the first time on appeal, “especially * * * when facts on which the * * * issue rests are in dispute.”